Why does the Whitehouse continue to get in the way of National Security?

Question

We saw them expose a CIA officer named Valerie Plame

Exposing a CIA officer is an act of treason and it also exposed many others that were still under cover out in the field.
They exposed her to discredit her husband Joe Wilson who had went to Niger and verified Saddam did not purchase components for WMD's like the Whitehouse said was the reason for the Iraq war. "Mushroom Clouds"

Now they have exposed a company who did nothing but research terror groups and the websites they use. This took the last seven years to develop and was an enormous tool in tracking chatter and video posts by Islamic extremists. Because of this al_Qaida is now silent on the net with little or no way of knowing what they are up to. The whole program has gone black.

How are we supposed to fight a war on terror when the Whitehouse keeps going out of its way to damage information capabilities.

America is not safer since 9/11, other than the fact that they put troops as targets in the Middle East

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071009/pl_afp/usattacksintelligenceleak

Link for Neocons

Get help, denial is a sickness

And here is the link that explains the truth from a non Mainstream Media point of view!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/08/AR2007100801817.html?hpid=topnews

If damaging our National Security right after a terrorist act attack and starting an illegal war based on false intellegence isn't grounds for the term "Treason" I can't think of what else it would be!

Even if it isn't - it should be at least grouds for impeachment!

Answer 1

Since the others that responded to your question did so with non-answer rants, I will at least make an attempt to answer it.

It appears that the Bush administration is really on the same side of the terrorist. Now we know why they put a stop to the CIA's hunt for Bin Laden when they were very close to catching him in Afghanistan.

Answer 2

Why do you people keep repeating this lie. Valerie was not considered an agent under the law. She had not worked overseas and was not in a covert role. She was a pencil pusher at langley, No one in the field was "exposed" by her being IDed, Her family and friends all knew she worked at the CIA. If you want to know who truly outed her, look at her husband. Until then back off on the BS until you can see the truth. Even the WA Post issued a retraction, you know the people you are using as a sourse, funny you didn't "find" that.

Answer 3

exposing a CIA officer is an act of treason? really? please cite the law that says so. love to see it though i know it don't exist. more lefty hack propaganda lies as usual based on nothing but idiocy.

it is a crime to expose a COVERT agent which we all know Blarier Plame wasn't. her neighbors knew she was CIA. we also know hubby perjured himself in front of congress changing his testimony on his politically motivated trip to Nigeria to try to make the bush administration look bad.

and as i stated in my post HOURS ago before you lefty hacks got ahold of it, those agencies have lefty hacks inside that have their own lefty hack agenda. CIA, FBI, GOA, State Department etc....many of which are clintonista leftovers that bush in his stupidity did not get rid of.
an investigation will ensue and i'll put money on the fact it will be a clinton hold over.

Answer 4

it is all politics.