I assume you mean this one:
A. Signing of Pleadings, Motions and Other Papers; Sanctions. Every pleading, motion, and other paper of a party represented by an attorney shall be signed by at least one attorney of record, whose address shall be stated. A party who is not represented by an attorney shall sign the party's pleading, motion, or other paper and state the party's address. Except when otherwise specifically provided by rule or statute, pleadings need not be verified or accompanied by affidavit. The signature of an attorney or party constitutes a certificate by the signer that the signer has read the pleading, motion, or other paper; that to the best of the signer's knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation. If a pleading, motion or other paper is not signed, it shall be stricken unless it is signed promptly after the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or movant. If a pleading, motion or other paper is signed in violation of this rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, shall impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred because of the filing of the pleading, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
The above basically states that the paperwork has to be signed either by the party of the procedings or by at least one lawyer representing the party.
It als says that when the person signs the paperwork that they certify the information is true and correct to the best of thier knowledge.
B. Verification of Pleading Generally. When in a family law action a pleading is required to be verified by the affidavit of the party, or when in a family law action an affidavit is required or permitted to be filed, the pleading may be verified, or the affidavit made, by the party or a person acquainted with the facts.
This section basically says that affidavits can be made by a person acquanted with facts. It seems odd and somewhat obvious that would be the case, but that's what I get out of it.
2007-10-09 09:10:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by davidmi711 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
in case you mandate that any one has to have documentation then every person is subject to that requirement. i've got self belief that whilst there are subject concerns with unlawful immigration we nevertheless might desire to have risk-free practices from over achieving police pastime. lots of the illegals are truthfully from Europe and Canada. we don't look to get too nerve-racking approximately them as they have a tendency to be some colors lighter than immigrants from South of the border. This makes me think of there's a racial bias interior the guidelines that are being legislated. If we made a regulation that would deliver the corporate and the unlawful the two to the rustic the unlawful got here with and took the passport from the corporate then shall we in all probability kill unlawful employment in a week.
2017-01-03 08:31:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by rozek 4
·
0⤊
0⤋