English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You know, like that Visa commerical.

Because, if you set aside healthcare (gosh knows how much that will cost) and just look at her recent proposals of the $5,000 baby benefit and the $1,000 new 401k for everyone, then do the math, you have:

$5,000 (baby benefit) + $1,000 (401K) = $6,000,

then take

$6,000 x $300,000,000 Americans (if that's right for population count)

and get

$1,800,000,000,000 ($1.8 Trillion, if my math is right)

So, the Visa commercial about "what's in your wallet" may be true if Hillary gets her way, because the only thing that will be left in your wallet will be a credit card.

Now, not everyone will have a baby, no doubt, but whatever number will, Hillary's benefits costs are going to have more digits "than a country mile."

Thoughts?

2007-10-09 08:42:01 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

For those of you who mention the Iraq War as a counter, please remember that Hillary signed off on that, too. And has yet to retract her decision.

2007-10-09 10:57:17 · update #1

5 answers

Yes she is, and she aims to take whatever you have, even if you don't want to give it up. Vote for anyone other than the devil in disguise Rodham and you are safe in 2008.

2007-10-09 08:49:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

It's none of her business. That's MY money!

She announced that the baby bond is off the table, probably because it was opposed be 2/3 of those polls. She's just targeting a different group to buy their votes with the 401K scheme that will be full of waste, expensive and won't benefit anyone.

She's just trading lots of tax dollars for a little retirement dollars. Either way we get screwed!

2007-10-09 09:07:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

No shes telling you what's going to be in your wallet (0) >>

2007-10-09 09:03:46 · answer #3 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 3 0

As long as she offsets any expenditure with revenue whats the problem?....do you prefer the current method of spending these same figures with no increase in revenue..... in other words its OK if your president puts the same 1.8 trillion on a "visa card"....(government debt).....as long as its being left for your kids and grandkids to pay for

2007-10-09 08:47:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 5

you are a partisan hack who hates Clinton (s). You do not even bother to use any logic or facts.

Let me see not al 300mil are working. 1000 are matching funds , 100o is up to amount.


Your math is wrong!


3,000,000,000,000 is the number added to national debt by Bush. Are you outraged?

2007-10-09 08:48:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 6

fedest.com, questions and answers