Sick children or the rich tycoon's estate?

Question

Which of these issues is more worth talking about to you, healthcare accesibility for sick children or the mega-rich losing their tax cut?

Answer 1

2 SIDES OF THE SAME COIN.

Answer 2

You fail to mention that the some of the families of those sick children can make over $80,000 a year. And that the Dems want to change SCHIP so that it doesn't just apply to POOR sick chidren and that to them a "child" is anyone under 25 years old. And you fail to mention that the Dems are trying to covertly use this legislation as a step to Universal Health Care.

And, you fail to state that even YOU got a tax break, as did I, and everyone else who paid taxes. Last month I made over $10,000. I paid $2343 in taxes. I've paid over $20,000 in taxes so far this year. I'm nowhere near MEGA-RICH and I REALLY don't want to pay more. That's just obscene.

I wonder why??

Geez man, at least Hillary can plainly state she's going to take things away from "for your own good."

Answer 3

Since children already have healthcare what exactly is your point? The rich are already the most heavily taxed group in America, and since you don't think logically I'll help you. People with money often put it back into the economy which is good for everyone. If you keep making it difficult on people who worked for their money, the economy will crash. Perhaps you should be more concerned with people who allow their children to go hungry because they had to get a playstation 3 with the latest welfare check. Naivity is no excuse for ignorance.

Answer 4

Well, lets see...if you take away our tax cuts, there will be much less money in the economy! I paid $75,000.00 in taxes last year....why shouldn't I get to keep some of my hard earned money? It is always the same propaganda that it is tax cuts for the ultra rich...I have news for you, I am not ultra rich and yet I pay the highest tax bracket while others pay virtually none. Stop supporting the children of illegal aliens and the parents and there would be more than enough money for American children. I for one am personally sick and tired of watching my money be taken out of my paychecks in huge amounts and then listening to whiney babies cry about what they don't have. Get a job, work three if you have to and make your own fortunes, stop stealing mine and then crying that I haven't given enough!!!!!!!!!

Answer 5

Right now, I am more concern about childrens healthcare, and the Hillaryscam she is trying to get passed, she could care less "about the children", but you can bet she will protect them mega rich from losing their tax cuts, she is big business and she has plenty mega rich business and foreigners funding her campaign. She can not be trusted with our children, or be trusted to take from her mega rich society , it is all a con.

THE HILLARY CLINTON STORY YOU SHOULD NEVER FORGET -- Children at the Hospital
American Spectator | March 1997
Posted on 12/05/2003 6:52:50 PM PST
(Story originally appreared in the American Spectator, March 97)

It seems that Hillary, who's had her fingerprints found on all the new scandals that are breaking on a daily basis is trying to fix her public image.
So, to promote the new effort, showing how deeply Hillary cares about children, especially sick children in hospitals, Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington got a call. Hillary Clinton would be coming over soon with children's author Maurice Sendak. Hillary's advance team would be showing up arranging the security and logistics. The team did show up. What they saw horrified them.
The kids in the hospital children's ward really looked sick! Some of them had tubes sticking out. Some had lost their hair to chemotherapy. Some were groggy because of the pain killers they had to take.
Hospital officials were quickly told this would not do. Hillary would look bad in a newspaper photo if she posed with sickly looking children. They were told. "No children that look drowsy, skip bald kids, sick looking kids, or kids with tubes sticking out."
So here's what the hospital actually did. They outfitted a hospital conference room with toys and kids decorations. They ordered hospital staff members to bring in their healthier children who would pose as sick children in photos with the great St. Hillary.
So, on January 10th, Hillary Clinton showed up to Georgetown University Medical Center and read to a bunch of kids with author Maurice Sendak. Had you read the papers or heard the news the next day, you might have been bowled over by her compassion. Actually she demonstrated the opposite. You see the real sick kids, who were originally told they would be visited by the first lady were originally extremely happy and excited at the prospect of her visit.
When they were later told, they were too sick looking to be with the great Hillary, some became deeply depressed. After all how would anyone feel not being good enough for Ms. compassion herself.
Of course the press published the photos of Hillary reading to the cute kids the next day. They just forgot to tell you that Hillary, in the quest of the perfect photo could not bring herself to be photographed with an actual sick child.
The phony mask of compassion that Hillary hides behind has slipped once again. Just around Purim time too!

It Takes a Village by HIllary Clinton. She wants government sponsored day care for kids, government own and operated. Does not take a rocket scientist to see that Hillary uses "for the children" to get to the parents. Brainwashing camps. Bigger government control, from birth ,without a doubt.

Vote 122: H R 1591: Ensign Amdt. No. 752, As Modified; To provide additional funding for certain programs under the Adam Walsh Child Safety and Protection Act of 2006, by increasing funding for the United States Marshals Service to track down convicted sex offenders who have failed to register as a sex offender as required by law and by increasing funding for United States attorneys to prosecute child exploitation and child pornography cases as part of Project Safe Childhood.
Hillary Clinton voted NO to this funding.

Answer 6

All issues are inter-related. If you take the tax cut away then in all likelihood tax revenues will fall leaving even less money available for any type of health care accessibility. It is impossible to discuss issues in a vacuum........

Answer 7

Apples and oranges.

That being said, nothing good has ever followed the statement "but it's for the children". Usually that is followed by us losing rights, and tighter restrictions on EVERYBODY regardless on whether they have children or not.

Answer 8

False dichotomy the tax cut has more than paid for itself.

Also the tax cuts went to anyone who pays taxes.

And you're forgetting whose money it is.

Answer 9

that probably depends on whether or not you are rich or have a sick child or not...

Answer 10

We could talk about your complete inability to compose an intelligent objective question that makes sense.