If it works, then great. But I would have tried everything when they had the 1st chance thinking it may be their only chance. And does this also mean Hilary gets to scrog the help? There will be a big box of cigars on Hilary's desk. Cubans.
2007-10-09 07:31:20 · 17 answers · asked by 84purpleshovel 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The Republicans have done a lot of damage in the last few years. The Democrats have a bunch of work in front of them.
2007-10-09 07:36:24 · answer #1 · answered by buffytou 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Meow
Bill Clinton engaged in Iraq ie: Operation Desert Fox ? Anybody ever read a history book ?
Cuban cigars News Corp stock reports, the China Trade Reports including real estate and satellites... Alittle Buddha
behind the desk. Mix 'um up. She has little more taste in men than she has in pant suits, office decor is not her forte. Time to clean out another closet.
Bring out the white suit boys. She is over the edge. Read on ! PS WFy I have over 100 links read and hand written in a note book just for these occasions. Today I can laugh. So call people clueless you best check your own profile. Studied this since 1998. I believe Hillary should have become a Senior Senator before running for President. There she could prove herself. Right now the news is crazy with obvious attempts to sway votes without clear thought as she offers them It is too late in the game to sway back and forth now.
Thank you very much.
2007-10-09 14:40:39 · answer #2 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Your first mistake is lumping them together. They are two separate individuals. "They" weren't President, Bill was President. If Sen. Clinton wins the election she will be the President, not Bill. There are political differences between them that can already clearly be identified. They hold the same basic political beliefs as all Democrats, but they are not Siamese twins. Sen. Clinton will have her own agenda and build her own legacy. Her Presidency will not be a mirror image of Bill's - anymore than Bush 43's is a mirror image of Bush 41.
I'm beginning to wonder if there is a Republican conservative alive that can ask a question about Hillary or Bill without inserting some snide, childish joke about interns, or cigars, or whatever. Geesh, grow up already.
2007-10-09 14:39:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I've been following those two since Bill was gov for AR.
Here's why it won't work. They tried it before and it fell flat on it's @$$. Cost us taxpayers 600 million dollars! Why should it be any differen't this time?
They are Liars, Schemer's, Thieves, Corrupt, Self righteous, Traitors, Some even suspect Assassins! And so much more I couldn't get it all on this page. And they aren't about to change either!
2007-10-09 14:52:06 · answer #4 · answered by Thomas Watts 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They were stuck with a republican congress that spent more time trying to find thing wrong with President Clinton than they did trying to do good for America. The republican congress hated the Clinton's so much, that if President Clinton would have wanted to invade Iraq, the Republican congress would have invited Saddam to Congress to prove he is a good guy.
2007-10-09 14:38:38 · answer #5 · answered by Michael G 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It seems there is more postings by people that can't stand Hillary on what her proposals are than anything else. I think I'll look at what her materials propose than the distortions and speculations posted by the clueless.
2007-10-09 14:48:10 · answer #6 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think that the answer to you question is the same reason why those 1990's bumper stickers that said "Don't reelect the President, or her husband either" are silly and false.
2007-10-09 14:38:06 · answer #7 · answered by evanbartlett 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What is the chance it wasn't yet thought of while he was in office, or not well formulated, remember, you can't just have an idea, you have to know how to implement it as well.
2007-10-09 14:35:30 · answer #8 · answered by sunnybear1978 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
You'll find out that Hilary will promote a lot of the things that Pres Bush proposed that Hilary didn't agree with when Bush proposed them because it was Bush who proposed it.
This is the way of the Dems!
2007-10-09 14:35:22 · answer #9 · answered by MJ MCK 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
The left are truely a bunch of sheep......For years, it's been told to us over and over again to invest for our own future. Now, just because Hillary is saying it......it's a new revolutionary idea????? The left has completely lost it......again.
2007-10-09 14:35:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋