If I were a Democrat, I would be ashamed that my party brazenly grubs for votes by pandering to the greedy and the lazy. The only legistlation Dems come up with lately is yet another variation on wealth distribution and socialist nonsense.
A lot of people initially supported Communism in the Soviet Union because the party leaders talked about protecting people, raising them from the shackles of servitude, and creating a new, selfless man.
What Communism actually did, was completely the opposite. It crushed the human spirit. It made people distrust everyone around them, taught them that ambivalence about their work was the only sane decision, and hardened their hearts.
Communism didn't create a new selfless man at all. It created a mistrustful recluse who was afraid to even speak to his neighbor, due to how the system rewarded people for identifying supposed opponents. People could not afford to be selfless at all. There was a saying in Russia: "If you aren't stealing from your job, you are stealing bread out of your family's mouth."
The Democrats are making the same mistakes as the Communists. They want the government to take over people's most important decisions in life. They want people to forget how to be self-sufficient so that they become dependent on the government. Did you know that one of the main differences between Republicans and Democrats was their level of generosity? Even removing church donations from the calculation, the average Republican gives at least 30% more to charity.
Democrats say they care about people, but what they really care about is making people so dependent on the government that they are compelled to vote Democratic. The Democrats know that people will become dependent on government assistance. Did welfare help or hurt? Welfare was supposed to be temporary assistance, but it turned entire generations of families into pathetically dependent people with a victim mentality. Some people couldn't even imagine living out in the real world. These people never had the chance to live normal lives. Was that compassionate?
Republicans care about giving everyone a chance at success. Democrats just want everyone to share deprivation. Democrats will try to con you into believing that you don't have to be responsible for yourself, and that the government can do it all for you. Here's a great example:
During the Presidential debates, the candidates were asked what they would do about unemployment. Kerry put on his best sad, hound dog face to mimic real human compassion, and gave the same line about how unemployment was no ones fault. He talked about creating some nightmarishly large and complicated bureaucracy to combat it.
That is what is called wh@ring for votes.... (and now Hillary is doing that as a full time job)
What did Bush say? He reminded us all that unless people develop in-demand skills, they will always be at risk of losing their jobs. The government can't change that. He also reminded people of the incredible community college system we have here; completely unique in the world, so adults can continue their education. Lastly, he reminded us that we all get tax credits for furthering our education, and companies often give bonuses or a higher pay level to people with upgraded credentials.
See the difference? Kerry didn't care about the people. He just wanted votes. He gave the answer designed to get votes.
Bush was completely honest. He gave the answer people don't want to hear. But Republicans don't want people to get dependent on government assistance because the system will always fail them. The government is not an employment office. The government does not have the power to fulfill our life dreams. That is where self reliance and individual initiative comes into play.
The Democrats insidiously try to remove those characteristics from our nature.
2007-10-09 07:24:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hillary is unelectable, it comes down to numbers, basically you have two contenders for the democrats, obama and hillary, so she has 50% between the two, but the obama supporters are strong and want change, they have no love for the clintons and they will not swing to hillary if she is the nomination, so 50-50 republican and democrat, but if she is the nomination the best she will do is 25% of the vote, the only unknown is who the republican nomination will be. anyway you look at it she is a liability for the democrats, we will never move forward with the clintons
2016-05-19 23:37:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillarious!
Are we sure she is not purposely sabotaging her campaign to spite Bill for years of philandering? (not to be confused with the lol philanthropy he gets others to do) She dumped the Baby Bond idea and now this? She alone will take down her campaign. All by her little cackling self. This is just too funny!
Thanks for the heads up. Been working on the China connection and other stuff. Sure would help if she's gone free up my days!
2007-10-09 07:19:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
We have a long way to go before the actual election. By that time all qualified morons will be entitled to the following benifits.
5000 because the exist.
1000 to start their own 401.
Matching funds.
Health Care Policy.
I wonder what is next. I bet by time you get to the election she will have promised everyone a living.
I wonder how I can defer my salary so I can participate it theses freebees for the irresponsible.
2007-10-09 07:17:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by ken 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Basically, Hillary is demanding that all of us dump our wallets into a large bucket from which she will dole out how much and to whom she decides is "deserving".
Of course, none of our work efforts will be considered.
2007-10-09 07:16:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Actaully that sounds like a Republican idea, see that would reward working people for saving for their own retirements. However it is already in the tax code that you can get a thousand dollar credit if you are married with kids.
1000's net,
THis program already exist.
2007-10-09 07:16:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I hope you realize that it's called socialism because they know most people run from Communism.
2007-10-09 08:51:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by CFB 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
How dare you question Shrillary? Shriilary knows what's best for us. She told us so.
2007-10-09 07:17:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by TedEx 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
i agree with you. this is just non sense. she has no business even walking out of her house.
2007-10-09 07:17:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋