My theory is that the boogeyman is going to be Takezo Kenzei.
Facts:
1. In the previews for the upcoming episode the little girl ( I cant remember her name, i think it is maggie) says " He IS the Boogeyman". this suggests that the boogeyman was in the room with her, and that the boogeyman is a person, and a guy.
2. We saw "the boogeyman" kill Hiro's father by launching him off a building, but the boogeyman was able to walk off. Takezo Kenzei can not die, therefore this would explain him walking off.
3. If someone can not die and lives in the 1600's what happens to him by the year 2007? Especially when everyone around him dies of old age and he can't join them. Like perhaps his chinese wife, when she dies does he go crazy?
4. The body type of the killer that flung Hiro's dad off the building matches that of Takezo Kenzei.
5. The symbols on the pictures given to hiro's dad/peter's mom match that of Takezo Kenzei.
6. Why concentrate on Kenzei if he wasn't part of something bigger?
2007-10-09 06:47:38 · 7 answers · asked by EB1285 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television ➔ Drama
you're a genius! all signs point to kenzei.
2007-10-09 06:57:30 · answer #1 · answered by jimvalentinojr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That an interesting - and unorthodox - theory, and if Heroes is anything, it's unorthodox. I think the jury may still be out on it, but it's actually plausible. I'm going to have to give this one a little more thought. As Arsenio Hall used to say, things that make you go Hmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!
2007-10-09 14:12:27 · answer #2 · answered by HipHopGrandma 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG here in merry old england they havent finished showing the first series (season) yet!
not answering the question, just sayin thx for the preview XD
2007-10-09 14:00:37 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmmmm interesting argument....i never thought of kenzei being the boogeyman, but i don't think it's him and i haven't really thought too much about the boogeyman to even consider anybody else...but you did make it sound convincing....i'll need some more time to think about that one.
2007-10-09 13:58:53 · answer #4 · answered by dimplez23 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is an interesting theory and you could very well could be right . I like the idea though . good luck and keep watching .
2007-10-09 14:03:10 · answer #5 · answered by Kate T. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree! My daughter and I were just talking about this last night.
2007-10-09 13:56:27 · answer #6 · answered by Been There2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very interesting. I hadn't thought of that. So, far they haven't shown anyone else that it could be.
2007-10-09 13:53:01 · answer #7 · answered by Fool in the Rain 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋