Now that it's the year 2007, why can't we have Japan or one of the many other orbiting satelites take "new" zoomed in photos of the moon surface showing the landing sight and rover left behind. It's only a matter of time before one of the Asian countries land a lunar module there a prove that the U.S. was in fact on the moon. Such a bizarre thing to think that it was a hoax!!
2007-10-09 03:08:27 · 13 answers · asked by Brian M 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
It's not a hoax. The US went there 6 times, and many men walked on the Moon, and they're alive today to tell the tale.
The reason satellites can't zoom in on the stuff left behind is because the satellites are 150,000 miles away, and the resolution is not good enough (yet) to show images down to the size needed to show the stuff.
2007-10-09 04:40:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That Chef's hat Lemon Cheese sports gives me an idea. Perhaps the astronauts should bake a cheese souffle on the moon, freeze it, and bring it back to Earth for examination. Once scientists determine that it could have only risen to the height it did in a gravity ~1/6 Earth's, then the hoax rumours could be put to rest.
2007-10-09 03:36:20 · answer #2 · answered by Eratosthenes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The moon landings have been genuine. placing aside each and all of the "information" to the different for a 2nd, only evaluate this: so very many human beings might have had to be in on the conspiracy that there is not any way that the secret could have been saved. whether particular brokers went around to every person engaged on the venture and threatened to kill them and their total relatives in the event that they blabbed, somebody might have enable the secret slip, surprisingly after 30+ years. guy hasn't long previous returned to the moon as a results of price and for the effortless actuality that there is not any reason to.
2016-10-06 09:05:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea. Kinda like the 'global warming' hoax,the weapons of mass destruction hoax, the UFO hoax, the communists in the US government hoax, the witches of Salem hoax. Society may be advancing, but some poor folks are left behind.
2007-10-09 03:28:22 · answer #4 · answered by davidosterberg1 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree they should, I personally believe weve been on the moon but I also believe alot of the photos were tampered with for more shock and awe. However it's like anything else there's always three sides to a story either sides, and the truth and I agree I would like to see another country play as an independant investigator
2007-10-09 03:51:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Those who think the lunar landings were a hoax are living in la-la land. See Wikipedia, which dismisses the hoax theories.
2007-10-09 03:40:22 · answer #6 · answered by dweebken 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because no space probe can cure a psychological disorder called paranoia?
The problem with the moon landing is not on the moon but in the neural pathways of those who distrust their fellow human beings in anything and everything.
2007-10-09 03:34:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally I can't wait until another country shoots images of the landing spots confirming we were in fact on the moon just to see how the conspiracy theorists react.
2007-10-10 08:01:36 · answer #8 · answered by rz1971 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
True enough. Though it may be awile before someone returns to one of the landing sites on the moon. That will depend on particular mission goals.
It won't be to provide "proof" of the old lunar landings, though. No one is going to waste money on that just to play up to some delusional conspiracy theorists.
2007-10-09 03:19:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Um, "lemon cheese"?
Just because the moon has a weaker gravitational pull than the Earth doesn't mean it is a "zero-gravity" object. The gravitational pull of the moon is around 1/6 that of Earth, but it's quite a long way from zero.
2007-10-09 03:15:48 · answer #10 · answered by JLynes 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋