English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

They did. The only people who think we didn't go are conspiracy theorists who don't understand basic science.

If you're one of them, go here.
http://www.badastronomy.com

All your stupid questions answered.

2007-10-09 02:59:42 · answer #1 · answered by eri 7 · 5 0

What would you consider 'convincing'? There are thousands of very convincing photos, hours of film, and hours of video. What is unconvincing about them?

They can prove man landed on the Moon, but it's a two-way street. The person looking at the evidence has to take the time to educate themselves about what they are looking at. All the 'anomalies' pointed out by conspiracy theorists are nothing more than uneducated mistakes and wilful misinterpretation of the images.

2007-10-09 03:10:07 · answer #2 · answered by Jason T 7 · 2 0

No telescope or satellite yet built can see the stuff left on the Moon, but some day there will be such a thing and more pictures will be released. But if you dismiss all previous pictures and videos (the ones taken by the Apollo astronauts themselves) as fake, wouldn't you also dismiss any new pictures as fake?

2007-10-09 03:25:29 · answer #3 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 1 0

All the pictures and videos are completely compatible with what they represent. No body with any understanding of physics and photography doubts it.
Who do you idiots think you are?
What the hell gives you the gall to spout such ignorant crap?
What qualifications do you have to even disagree with the evidence? You and your ilk are less than a criminal waste of bandwidth( and space).
Get an education so you can realize what dipshits you all are.

2007-10-09 03:33:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NASA's tapes of the lunar landings are convincing (naturally--since they did land on the moon)--and there's no reason for them to waste time andmoney pandering to the delusions of some mentally disturbed "conspiracy theorists."

2007-10-09 03:09:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I think it best if you tell us in a new and restated question what (if any) criteria would be required to prove to you man landed on the moon. Then we could better tell you if the criteria can be met.

2007-10-09 03:45:34 · answer #6 · answered by Eratosthenes 3 · 0 0

Pictures ???? How many do you want ? Millions have been shown .
No intelligent person even questions the landings . Of course , you're not in that category .

2007-10-09 04:09:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NASA has tens of thousands of convincing pictures. It is not their fault that you are walking through life with both eyes shut crying "I am blind! I am blind!".

;-)

2007-10-09 03:04:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers