English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean you have the left and the right and you all keep fighting over which one is right and how the other side is misinformed etc etc. Why not skip that and work on something like how to end the senseless cycle of starvation, free electricity, start a company with others to use bio-fuels or remove fuel dependency all together. Before you ask me why don't I do that. I do, I sit and think and try to figure out ways to fix things and not policy things, things that really matter. Not one corporation or government or religion has your best interests at heart. Otherwise when Tesla figured a way for electricity to be wireless and free it would be now, we wouldn't be charged for water, we wouldn't be using cars that cost equal to a yearly salary if not more.

2007-10-09 02:50:52 · 6 answers · asked by PharPhromNormal 2 in Politics & Government Politics

SayWhat? You haven't figured out the answers you bash each others views on politics instead taking that same time to unify over common problems.

Tess even when they aren't campaigning they waste money getting nothing done.

Jon B the problem is that we don't have a free market, we have a market manipulated by those that have all the wealth what I speak of is closer to idea of humanitarianism combining its efforts with technology. I'm not asking the government or a politician to do anything.

badgirl I agree politics and big business along with religion all share one giant bed and if it isnt profitable why bother doing it!

2007-10-09 07:59:27 · update #1

FredP That actually wrong on your 2nd point much of that technology is available. Tesla's idea for free wireless electricity did not harm humans he was going to use the ionosphere. Basically the concept is to take a ball of electricity and much like tether ball, hit it again and again as it looped around the earth and then you could draw from that power anywhere on earth. (that sorta takes the first sentence of 2 and 3 out) Consider that we have farmers that are paid not to grow crops and that hydroponics are doing wonders for where vegetables and food can grow. The true problem is compassion, a rebounding recirculating wave of compassion.

I agree it is that wall of self-serving money grubbing politicians and lobbyist and big wigs that don't want you to be free because you can't make any money on whats free and since they live in that world of fear you pointed out there is the problem.

I write alot of solutions. What we need is the rejuvination of human spirit. To be free.

2007-10-09 08:07:09 · update #2

6 answers

1. It's easier for people to argue with their pre-conceived notions than it is for them to do the research and develop a well-thought-out opnion based on the facts. That's why the same morons (from both sides of the aisle) keep getting elected - they DEPEND on their constituents' laziness. They also depend on their constituents' greed (ie, what can my senator get for me???). The more bacon they bring home, the more they're seen as "representing their consituents' interests."

2. As far as the other suggestions (free electricity, end starvation, end fuel dependency, etc....) - much of that technology isn't even available. Even if it were, you'd be up against the self-serving politicians, the lobbyists and the uninformed sheeple. They don't want change - they're AFRAID of it, because it attacks their own safe little self-centered world.

3. Wireless electricity has some MAJOR technical/health issues.... you don't get something for nothing (and by that, I don't mean the cost).

4. Lastly - since you sit around and think about these thing.... why don't you DO them and set an example for the public to see. I'm serious, and not being sarcastic. Get the word out and get involved. Don't just keep it to yourself and the others on the Yahoo Answers page....

Calif Deputy

2007-10-09 03:03:50 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

We should not be relying on government to solve our problems. If the ideas you speak of are profitable in the free market, they will happen. Otherwise you are asking the government to build a company that may not be profitable at the expense of the tax payers.

I agree what you are saying is important; however we should not be asking politicians (who have no experience in anything other then campaigning) to sort out the worlds problems.

2007-10-09 02:58:28 · answer #2 · answered by JonB 5 · 0 1

I agree with what your saying, there is a purpose for government yet they waste so much time bickering and it is all about how they can win votes not what is the best option for community. Especially during campaigns they spend more time and effort trying to make the other party look bad they really need to start pulling there socks up, it ludicrous the amount fo money they waste achieving next to nothing.

2007-10-09 02:56:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Great point. I admit that I have been sucked into this quagmire of partisan blame and insult. But I do think that the gov't and the corporations have a stranglehold on this country when it comes to new technology. They decide if something is a threat and will destroy it if they can. The electric car is a great example of that.

2007-10-09 03:07:00 · answer #4 · answered by slykitty62 7 · 2 0

We HAVE figured out the answers for ourselves. We fight over politicians to make sure we are represented by the politician who most represents our views as to what the answer in question is.

2007-10-09 02:54:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

You sound like a very smart informed person and you make a great point.

2007-10-09 02:53:59 · answer #6 · answered by schneider2294@sbcglobal.net 6 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers