English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-09 02:31:55 · 9 answers · asked by JAMES 4 in Arts & Humanities History

9 answers

No, but Australians and South Koreans did.

2007-10-09 03:02:48 · answer #1 · answered by tom 6 · 2 0

during the Vietnam conflict the U.K. had no forces committed to ground action,however,I'm sorry to say that all the previous answers who have put no are wrong,although U.K.L.F.were not involved there were members of the 22ND special air service acting as observers/advisers for part of this conflict.

2007-10-13 02:25:04 · answer #2 · answered by the devil wears camo 5 · 0 0

No, because at that time our PM wasn't the USA's lap dog. Unlike Tony and Bush!!

2007-10-13 00:47:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, we did not. Thank God that our Prime Minister at the time, Harold Wilson was sensible enough to say 'no' when asked to send troops, and was not a lickspittle of the American president like his successor, Tony Blair.

2007-10-09 05:32:49 · answer #4 · answered by rdenig_male 7 · 1 2

No, but America shouldn't have gone in either trying to clean up a French mess.

2007-10-09 06:26:41 · answer #5 · answered by rz1971 6 · 0 1

No,. The Americans never support us in our conflicts-so why should we be interested in supporting them in theirs.

2007-10-09 07:50:43 · answer #6 · answered by Hobilar 5 · 0 2

No. Fortunately they had leaders with more sense then.

2007-10-09 05:42:24 · answer #7 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 1 2

No they didnt that was Americas war !

2007-10-09 02:50:25 · answer #8 · answered by Matt 1 · 0 4

No

2007-10-09 02:36:22 · answer #9 · answered by October 7 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers