ok, the "anti's" post many links and stories to support the theory of the McCanns being disgusting child killers. I haven't seen a link from a supporter to support their theory,
why is this???
is it because they know their crime and can't defend them???
2007-10-09 00:23:09 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Yes good point! I have still to see support from Leicestershire Health Authority, Glenfield Hospital Trust, Melton Mowbray Surgery were Kate McCann works.
2007-10-09 01:26:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I was so tempted to ignore your question, but I will back them up. I will ask one favour of you, and anybody reading. Please be kind enough to use the intelligence, which I'm sure you have, and think about this.
All the "evidence" to support the abduction theory is admittedly circumstancial, but it is a number of factors all pointing very loudly in one direction. Here we go. There is a very large amount of people trafficking going on around the world. Many voluntary agencies and many police forces agree on this. Peadophiles are very clever people and are very driven. So they will be in areas where there is very poor security, such as the resort. So the resort has very poor security, three children sleeping - will they pounce? You bet. Then could possibly have thought, shall we set up the parents - after all, they will be suspected. So they get away. The police fail to secure the crime scene for many hours, doesn't that ring alarm bells with many people? So I am not an admirer of those police. The portugese police know that people trafficking is huge, so they know that it is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Many difficult sightings, such a difficult job, they might never solve. They concentrate their efforts on Kate and Gerry. Some DNA "evidence" links them to it, but it could possibly be easily explained. They make them official suspects to enable harder questions and to keep them quite. This helps. I also suspect that Jane Tanner probably did see a guy running away with a child under a blanket.
So, if you can put it all together, that is strongly suggestive of an abduction. I really don't think a newspaper link is much more help.
2007-10-09 01:59:52 · answer #2 · answered by Ken the sleuth 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
All I know for sure is:-
They left their kids alone to go for a meal
All the 'evidence' released is suggested evidence being held by police from press statements/briefings from McCanns and Police
All the press reports are based on these statements/briefings
That's it - no one can be 100% sure they did or didn't do it and anyone stating that is just dumb
2007-10-09 00:50:10 · answer #3 · answered by Saucy B 6 · 7⤊ 1⤋
A link? You mean a newspaper link etc?
If so, anyone who uses a newspaper article which has no solid information and depends on pure speculation bordering on lies to sell newsprint, is repeating the juvenile behaviour of the playground. Bullying and witch hunts spring to mind.
2007-10-09 00:39:16 · answer #4 · answered by James Mack 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Because they keep even denying they are child neglectors when the proper McCanns admit they left the kids alone, they don't have links or anything to prove anything, apart of the famous 'innocent till proven guilty' but, at least, we all know the neglected part is proven. But they keep saying no (the supporters I mean).
2007-10-09 00:37:05 · answer #5 · answered by anthony j 3 · 8⤊ 6⤋
It's because there is no evidence to support the abduction theory apart from the 'Humpty Dumpty' photofit given by Tanner. This lacking of abduction evidence in addition to the McCanns low moral fibre has now been accepted by both the PJ and our fine Bobbies as the focus of the enquiry.
2007-10-09 00:31:56 · answer #6 · answered by Shambo The Magnificent 1 · 12⤊ 6⤋
Shambo posted a link to the mysterious egg man last night.
Here's another one :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEyHoceaPHw
Poor guy - everybody's picking on him.
2007-10-09 01:14:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anna 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Kamran - please stop going on about this! YOU DONT KNOW if they did it (killed her, not left them alone)..I mean unless you are involved in the investigation YOU DONT KNOW! You are basing your opinion on tabloids and you have the right to do so...thats what pro mccanns are doing aswell..basing it on tabloids!! None of us know what really happened! You have the right to your opinion but why are you posting questions trying to start a slagging match, what will that achieve?? You wont be able to start a educated and well thought out discussion on the matter because yoou are being rude and argumentative!!!
Do you see my point, you have a right to your opinion but so does everyone else. Do people who support the mccanns have to prove to YOU why they do so...can they not have thir own opinion like you can...everyone is basing their opinion on the same thing..on what we are being told.
2007-10-09 00:37:39 · answer #8 · answered by Emssssssssss 3 · 6⤊ 8⤋
Simply because they don't have to - they can continue to hide behind reciting the "innocent until proven guilty" mantra.
2007-10-09 00:42:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
Probably because there aren't any links to support their theory.
2007-10-09 00:29:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 12⤊ 6⤋