2007-10-08 23:44:12 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
they new there was a problem and did nothing about it...........
2007-10-09 03:21:32 · answer #1 · answered by DennistheMenace 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably don't have to prove negligence (a common law Tort) but nowadays use proof of breach of statutory duty - have a look at the Health & Safety at Work Regulations, - any particular regulation depending on the circumstances - easier to show liability than with negligence alone.
2007-10-09 12:31:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you where injured whilst in work, and was not fooling around then you have a case. It will just be a case of how liable are the company (100% or 70%), if you were partly to blame then they can get liability reduced , however they are ALWAYS liable it is just a point of how much? To be honest depending on your case most are dealt with out of court settlements, were liability is never proven.
2007-10-09 09:14:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That the hazard was purposely left unattended to for a period of time..
2007-10-09 06:51:57 · answer #4 · answered by PEGGY S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋