Obviously its not, 'cos they aren't.
Don't you think, Theo, that the fact that this new news "is plastered all over the tabloids" (your words, not mine) should tell you something???
The tabloids plastered false DNA reports a number of times before as well...don't you remember??? The PJ themselves, as well as a reputed Brit forensic lab, flatly refuted those claims.
2007-10-08 21:41:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Faith 6
·
3⤊
9⤋
You really are a pathetic sad minded individual with over 130 questions about the same subject
To repeat a previous poster:-
Oi, little man, Shut the F*ck up
2007-10-09 10:28:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by flippin'eck 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
oh for heavens sake, do your research. The DNA has been explained. LOGICALLY! I won't waste MY time finding you a link to the report, go find it yourself.
2007-10-09 04:20:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
DNA results are 100 percent reliable.If you can not rely on that only third degree methods will be available.
2007-10-08 21:51:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by leowin1948 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
They don't think, they are just a bunch of sheep's following the McCanns and forgetting about MADELEINE who was left behind.
2007-10-08 22:46:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tim 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Not according to the times
"Madeleine McCann evidence inconclusive"
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2617545.ece
2007-10-08 22:05:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by toietmoi 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Time will tell on this thouigh I fear it may take some time.
It is not just the parents who are on trial it is the Portgese Police aswell thanks to the spin doctors from team mcCann
2007-10-08 21:41:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by omar 2
·
8⤊
1⤋
Hi Theo, not seen the papers so can't say. have you a link.
2007-10-08 21:42:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Van der Elst 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
yes there are conclusive then they should be locked up
2007-10-11 23:34:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by crazy kim 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tabloids, no further comment!
2007-10-08 21:42:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Annie M 6
·
5⤊
2⤋