The Clintons, Bushes and bin Ladens are all Illuminati. Should any of them get elected, expect the dollar to die and become the "amero".
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=15017
The only way to save America is a non-conventional Presidential candidate. No Democrat, no Republican. At least, not a party voter.
Rudy Giuliani is Illuminati too. Don't let his crime reduction in New York fool you. He committed the biggest crime September 11, 2001.
www.loosechange.com
At least if you elect Ron Paul, he will get the budget under control. That is, if America wants that. Maybe everyone is so interested in their own union or small piece of the pie they just want America to die. Good luck with that. What good is making $30 an hour when the dollar is worthless and we're back to a barter standard?
2007-10-08 22:11:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Democrats have a history of shooting themselves in the foot, particularly when handed a gun by the Republicans.
Hillary is a different case, shes got a much smarter machine than Kerry did, particularly with the response to smear tactics that sunk Kerry.
Its really early days yet to call the election in November, but my bet is that we are so sick of the BS that the Republicans have put out that the White House goes Democrat.
But the House and Senate may stay the same, we have a tendency to think the ones we elect are good, its only the ones from the other states who get into trouble.
If the Republicans don't distance themselve from Bush they will lose a lot more than they thought, but they know that, so I look for those who are up for election this year to start standing up to 'prove' their independence from Bush.
Watch for overturned vetos in the future.
2007-10-08 22:05:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by justa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Democrats will probably win, but, if he runs, I'm betting on Al Gore. If he doesn't run, either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.
2007-10-08 21:34:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bob C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, it's an interesting proposition. For years, the Democrats have had a tradition of nominating unelectable candidates.
Now it seems as if the Republicans want a go at it.
Cheers.
2007-10-08 21:31:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by blueevent47 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Greetings. The democrats have aligned themselves to the republicans yet again and given the president his requested 200 billion dollars to continue his illegal war. making them even more guilty according to law of war crimes by aiding and abetting a crime in progress. If there is any alternative offered then the Democrats have completely opened the door for them by destroying any credance that they still had with their backing of this administration totally against the voters who voted them in to try to turn the administration around and stop the war in Iraq. The Democrats stand little chance of making it. Who wants to vote for cowards, either male or female? We don't need more cowards in high office, we need ones with honesty and intelligence. America has never had a female president. the president is always of English heritage and is always a male. no one else is even allowed to run usually. at present we are allowing war crimes to be committed and allowing the destruction of our basic rights in the constitution by our illegal government. Hillary is simply put up there as a contender in a attempt to get female voters to vote using sex as the deciding factor and not record, also to distract the easily distracted female part of our nation so they will not notice that the government is killing off their children, husbands and fathers. If one really wants a female president, and I cannot see why one would not, since the males seem to be totally incapable of honestly filling the office. then how about the head of the peace movement. Shehan (probably spelled wrong i know) she has proven to have courage, something our current administration totally lacks. has proved herself able to function under pressure, she functioned with the entire weight of the government against her when she demanded to be allowed to ask the question. "What did my son die for?" And I have not noticed her lying as Hillary is constantly doing about most things including her stance voting to invade Iraq and now her stance that she was never for it or was deluded. Her job is to investigate the facts and then vote on the truth. she simply votes with the ruling party. who needs a yes woman as leader? be simply another bush, just a different puppet master at the controls. Seems to me that if the women of the country get behind a movement to get her on the ballot and if the women could hold it together long enough to vote for her that many men would also vote for her. she is the only one out there that actually would be acceptable to both men and women for all the right reasons. None of the people running for office actually is suitable for the position at all. all are deeply flawed and owned by their money people, the corporations. and most are really simply carbon copies of each other. even their answers are copies out of the same script. are they not honestly?
2007-10-08 22:01:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rich M 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
It would give me good reason to start stockpiling weapons....if that's the case..then the end is imminent..not near.
Or better yet I can quit work and have the govt pay for everything.
2007-10-09 03:09:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
mm, too early to tell... at this point, anything can happen between now and 6 months from now, say.
I feel bad, however, for the next president whoever it may be. They will have to pick up bush's mess and it's not going to be easy.
2007-10-08 21:37:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by シ Pete 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
i hope so as Cher said you would have to be fckn mad to elect another bush as far as i can see the republicans are all little god bothering flag waving bushes
2007-10-08 23:14:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
While the election is the Dems' to lose - I still feel they have the capacity to lose it.
2007-10-08 21:59:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
2⤊
0⤋