Shoud a coalition of the willing free the US from its president?

Question

Why did the US invaded Iraq?
Some people will say: Because they had WMD`s! Well they did not….
Well, at least they are free from a cruel dictator! Well, like so many others…
Now, what if a “coalition of the willing”, decided to free all Americans from this lunatic named George W Bush, which many call a dictator?
-He is not a dictator! We live in a democracy! True, but Chavez who republicans call a dictator was elected while our (ouch) friend Bush was selected.
So in theory he could be consider a dictator and therefore persona non grata for mankind.
How would Americans react if such coalition decided to invade the US to free its people from Bush?
The Iraq invasion is no laughing matter. It was an immoral, illegal state sponsored terror act against a sovereign nation, yet governed by someone as crappy as a leader as Bush is a retard.
Saddam received his punishment from its people. Bush will be punished by history.

As a complementary homage to my intelligent conservative friends that will come to spit their rage all over the screen, one more paradoxical question: Being the definition (look it up, it`s on the dictionary) of terrorism is –noun . the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes, please amswer me: What was the biggest ever terrorist act carried out against innocent civilians? Wrong! not 9/11! A AK-47 bullet to the ones who answered the Nuke dropped over Hiroshima and Nagasaki! Can you imagine all those little tiny semi-opened jap eyes closed forever and the skin peeling off babies??!!! Don`t give me all your same reasons for it (Japan would do that, we actually saved lives, bla, bla, bla) just think on the question for god’s sake!!

Hi eonlyb. thanks for wasting your time to peek my profile. You read I travelled the world too. And met many people NOT friends. I know the difference because I have a few true ones. Glad to meet you too. By the way I'm not trying to polarize with anyone. Just trying to make the world a little better.

Answer 1

No, they shuld transfer you to Gitmo. ASAP.

Answer 2

First, name ONE violation of any treaty, resolution, etc. which makes the Iraq war illegal. You can't do it, or else you have added it into your babbling. If any of your heros in congress could do it, Bush would be gone by now, I mean they've been itching to impeach him since before he got in office, but for what? Uhhhhh.... Nope, nothing.

Contrary to what you may have watched on T.V. from you couch in your living room, WE DID FIND WMD's.

Sorry, we might not have found shiny nuclear rockets that you were hoping for. We have uncover THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of chemical artillary shells, which if employed could easily kill MILLIONS. Also, labratories have been found where biological agents have been tested which could very easily be loaded into artillary shells as well or placed in warheads to kill MILLIONS MORE.

Ballistic missiles have also been uncovered which were designed to be a vehicle for delivering chemical and biological agents, though they were never perfected.

If this isn;t enough proof, I will remind you also of the 300,000+ BODIES which were recovered from mass graves, killed by chemical attacks by the Iraqi military in the late 1980's.

Again, this is why we are in Iraq:

We have been under attack by Islamic extremists for over 30 years. Look back to the Marine Barracks bombing in Beirut, to the Iranian hostage standoff, countless embassy bombings, WTC bombing, USS Cole, 9/11. When will it end? The idea of taking out Hussein, did not have anything to do with 9/11 i agree, but the ends do justify the means here in my eyes. Here is why.

Since we have sent our troops to Iraq, where have the terrorist attacks against the U.S. occured? - In Iraq, on their own side of the world. Terrorist groups from all over the Middle East are focusing their efforts against U.S. forces in Iraq. THAT IS THE PLAN. If they want to fight us fine, we'll have the fight, but instead of having them taking up arms (or airplanes) against innocent U.S. civilians, we are sending our professional military to do the job it was meant for - to destroy our enemies.

So far, this has been proven more effective combatting terrorism against the U.S. than ANY diplomatic measure Clinton, Carter or any of your other false heroes have ever taken. Actually, we are just cleaning up their failures.

Answer 3

we'll probably have to wait till people realize that our electoral process is rigged and the BS will continue even though Bush is gone...republican or democrat, the people don't choose their presidents. Period. and with E-voting it's getting worse. your question has it's validity but how to you turn couch potatoes into revolutionaries??? On the other hand you're completely obnoxious and i'd rather join the empire if idiots like you are on the side of justice.

Answer 4

I would like to point out that Saddam would still be killing his people, instead of them hanging Saddam, if it wasn't FOR Bush.

You strike me as a gutless liberal who enjoys his American bennies but won't fight to defend them.

Another slacker with liberal drivel on Yahoo...sigh! To think I paid taxes for education and THIS is the end product... you didn't learn a thing yet.

Answer 5

There are many hidden ways to free America of her King George.

Instead of worrying what they are going to do to "save" us, go join your local Democratic Club, and MoveOn.org, and work for the campaign and bills you believe in in your local area.

I despise King George. That's why I volunteer to help my local Dems.

As for Bush being punished, he is one of those people who would not even think he had done anything wrong if the world prosecuted him in a war crimes trial. He has no conscience to speak of.

In short, he just doesn't get it.

Answer 6

sorry, i was laughing so hard at your ..."question" that it was taking me awhile to answer. your about eight years to late. if we wouldve freed ourselves from the last liberal wingnut in the white house we wouldve had a president who wouldve kept it zipped up and actually accepted the capture of bin laden from sudan, hence this entire discussion woudlve been moot.

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

Answer 7

Somewhere, in there, I'm sure there's a question he hasn't already answered himself or went into a some lunatic like rage and ranted on and on about something with big words off of his word of the day calendar, I'm sure. Dr. Livingston, off we go to search for this elusive question. It will be a long and perilous journey. Make sure you tell your loved ones you love them. Off we go now.

Answer 8

Is there a coalition for freeing our country from all of the socialists posing as liberals?