i don't think there's a big difference between bush and hitler if they both kinda planned to blow something up in an indirect way and put the blame on somebody else, i'm sure money is involved
2007-10-08 16:39:05 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wonderful news out of Iraq. Things are changing for the better my friend!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/08/wanbar308.xml
2007-10-08 16:43:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
That's a bit of revisionist history. Hitler put blame on the Treaty of Versailles and the Wiemar Republic, not the Communists. In the 1920s and '30s, Communists and Fascists were allies. They both had essentially the same political beliefs and platforms. The only difference was and is that Communists think the state should own the means of production and Fascists think the state should control the means of production but leave ownership in private hands. In order for your suggestion to make sense, Republicans would also have to be fans of big government. True conservatives are against big government.
2016-05-19 21:03:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's some solid logic.
It wasn't terrorists that destroyed the twin towers. No. That was George Bush that did that. Just like he's blowing up people several times a day in Iraq, day after day after day. The man gets around. I'm sure he's responsible for all the crimes that go on every day in this country, too. I think I'll have him arrested for breaking into my car last week...good thing I remembered to remove my stereo faceplate! Silly George, breaking into cars like mine when you could just increase taxes like the Clintons and take my money legally!
2007-10-08 16:45:41 · answer #3 · answered by dagiffy 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Do all of us a big favor and go blow your head off like Hitler did, he was a Coward jest like you, and in the words of, Harry S Truman in World War 2, if you can not take the heat get out of the kitchen.
2007-10-08 17:03:07 · answer #4 · answered by Richie for da ben dan 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
First do you have any proof that terrorists were not responsible for the WTC. After the facts came out who was Bush suppose to blame? Perhaps you would have accepted this from Gore? If he blamed Al quada would you be asking this question?
2007-10-08 16:43:27 · answer #5 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I think he did i hope he goes to hell because he not a good president.Cant wait until he leaves the house i also hate osama.I hate that day.but why the Twin Towers.Why?
2007-10-10 16:50:36 · answer #6 · answered by I Love Twilight! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And now you have made a speech and blamed Bush.
You're just like Hitler too!
2007-10-08 16:42:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
Don't blame the liberals for this one---this guy's a total INDEPENDENT....
2007-10-08 16:51:09 · answer #8 · answered by LittleBarb 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that's okay...Harry reid made a speech similar to bin laden's after phony stories about guantanamo bay surfaced.
2007-10-08 16:42:52 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Let me give you some toilet paper to clean the sh*t from spueing out!
Get a freaking life, freak!
2007-10-08 16:43:25 · answer #10 · answered by Numb 4 · 7⤊ 2⤋