Sandy Berger, the Archive Burgler
David Rosen, the Fundraising Crook
Norman Hsu, the Crooked Contributor
William Jefferson Clinton, the rapist and perjuror
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/Juanita.htm
http://www.hillaryproject.com/index.php?/en/story-details/did_clinton_appointed_judge_throw_rosen_case_to_protect_hillary/
http://www.peterfpaul.com/category/david-rosen
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Norman_Hsu
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/01/sandy_berger_what_did_he_take.html
All that and much more while Hillary floats above it all, pure, innocent and blissfully ignorant. Is somebody that blind and naive qualified to be president?
2007-10-08 15:49:47 · 10 answers · asked by callAspadeAspade 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Somebody that naïve shouldn’t even be elected President to the Homeowners Association. LOL
2007-10-08 15:52:26 · answer #1 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Well when the only new source that is willing to report these things is Fox News, all the other ignore it or give a 5 second account of it while spending 20 minutes on why the other people (Democrats and Republicans) are not fit for the job. With her background if she tried to get a security clearance she would never get one. Now many Democrats are falling in line behind her. How thick headed can some people be?!
2007-10-08 15:58:31 · answer #2 · answered by Prof. Dave 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Because the polls tell her to ignore all that so she can claim ignorance of it when it all comes out later... :-)
And the liberal media lets her get away with it! That is the real issue. If she were a republican, her scandals would have buried her by now. But she always seems to get a free pass by the media...
2007-10-08 16:03:25 · answer #3 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
She's aware of it.
People claim she so intelligent, she has to be aware of the funny business. Hillary probably won't admit to anything though. She is definitely not naive!
That's one thing that makes her so dangerous. She keeps aligning herself with questionable people. What type of "scoundrels" will she appoint!
2007-10-08 15:57:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Of course she isn't qualified. If she really is unaware of all the criminal activity around her she isn't qualified because she's an idiot. If she is aware (and she is), then she's a criminal too and again isn't qualified.
2007-10-08 18:25:36 · answer #5 · answered by rick b 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So to make your point you have to tell bare faced lies.
Berger was convicted of a misdemeanour offence that did not involve burglary.
Bill of course has never been charged with rape and was acquitted of perjury.
And any conservative that wants to talk about criminal records should really be interested in sorting out thier own side of the fence first. You guys still think Oliver North is a hero for selling guns to our enemies.
2007-10-08 16:05:35 · answer #6 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Either lying about not knowing or running an irresponsible campaign.
2007-10-08 15:57:40 · answer #7 · answered by pgb 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
She isn't stupid - she knows! Hillary just ignores it and hope it will go away.
2007-10-08 16:19:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
must be a psychological condition called "Bush Syndrome".
2007-10-08 15:58:51 · answer #9 · answered by Whoops, is this your spleeen? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is not a question. It's a statement with a question mark and the world 'How' at the front.
Stop abusing this service.
2007-10-08 15:57:28 · answer #10 · answered by James P 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋