other countries won't use them properly but will use them to harm others.
meanwhile-its still the only country to use nukes on another one (out of racism..lets me honest about that pearl habor was just an excuse) and now this comes to light?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071009/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/assassination_weapon
2007-10-08 15:33:54 · 6 answers · asked by Banned from yahoo 5 times 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
spoken like out of touch conseravtives!..believe it or not most people in the world don't really care much for america. they simply want to beable to feed themselves.
iran could have bought weapons from russia over 20 years ago. or they could have gotten them from india AND the paki's ten years ago..OR EVEN CHINA
got news for you..THEY NEVER DID.
that third world dictator crap doesn't work anymore.
but here's something lost on you conservatives.
REAGAN sold weapons to the iranians...and let north take the blame.
oh the irony
2007-10-08 15:43:24 · update #1
How DARE we look after our own interests first.
We should just lay down and let everyone else take advantage.
Swift thinking, that.
2007-10-08 15:40:30 · answer #1 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There are 187 nations which have signed the Nuclear Non-Prolieration Treaty. It's an international agreement. BTW, the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki killed over 80% of all the Christians in Japan. The one used on Hiroshima killed American POWs.
2007-10-08 22:57:05 · answer #2 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's be honest, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Pearl Harbor had nothing to do with nukes in Japan.
However; you bring up an interesting point.
Would it be more fun to nuke an entire population or just the few bad guys???
2007-10-08 22:43:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
ouch, I'm a registered republican and i have to agree with you. i believe in the government being conservative fiscally. i also believe in fairness. if India, china, Russia, France, the UK have rights to nukes, then everyone else should as well. might make for better diplomacy. the whole "nuke" thing is based on deterrents. if everyone had them, like guns, then the other might think twice about imposing on the other.
2007-10-08 22:46:12 · answer #4 · answered by andy h. 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You must be listening to some of those fine liberal teachers we have here in the US.
Two words grow up!
2007-10-08 22:58:49 · answer #5 · answered by ULTRA150 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My God...you think nuclear proliferation by third world dictators is a good idea. Your foolishness knows no bounds. Please think about it...if you're capable.
2007-10-08 22:40:17 · answer #6 · answered by Salsa Shark 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋