What do you think of these 9/11 documentaries?

Question

Please watch them first before commenting:

http://www.seeloosechange.com

http://www.belowgroundsurface.org

http://www.911weknow.com

http://www.truth911.net

Answer 1

These films are not useful as sources of true information.

Two examples:
======================================
FACT: The buildings did not fall at free fall speeds.

The fall time was analyzed by NIST (National Institute of Science & Technology) , which used seismic recorders & other techniques to measure the fall time. Their results:

1. The exterior panels took 9-11 seconds. They fell this fast because they were not impeded by anything & this is perfectly normal.

2. The inner parts of WTC 1&2 (roughly 60 stories of WTC 1 and 40 stories of WTC 2) stood 15 to 25 seconds after collapse initiation before they, too, began to collapse. This is far slower than a free-fall.

You can read this in NIST’s own words at Point 6 at http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
===================================
FACT: Prof Jones has been completely discredited.

The “intellectual leader” of the 9-11 conspiracy theorists may be Prof. Jones, from BYU (Brigham Young University).

Jones is a member of the physics dept. & his research is in “cold fusion,” an area that’s not related to civil engineering.

The correct department for analysis of the twin-tower collapse is engineering, not physics.

The engineering dept at Jones OWN University (BYU) has heavily criticized Jones.

D. Allan Firmage, Professor Emeritus, Civil Engineering, BYU, called Jones’ statements “very disturbing.” Also, "The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology [at BYU] do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones."
See http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm to see how Jones was ripped apart by his own University.

Jones made so many false statements about thermite being used in 9/11 that finally the editors at “Implosion World” contacted him. They cornered him with the facts. He admitted that his theories had many unexplained holes. He also admitted that none of the steel showed thermite’s “degenerative fingerprint.”

See page 7, section 4 of http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

This is a impressive criticism of Jones from the leading demoltion journal in the world. Read it.

Answer 2

Notice how government conspiracy theory proponents cannot intelligently challenge the facts presented in these videos. Invariably they need to attack people.

The government 9/11 Commission Report has errors and omissions. If the government theory is full of hot air, you've got to expect that it will get filled with something.

Professor Steven Jones has a persuasive argument for planned demolition. Steel framed buildings do not collapse at free-fall speed unless they are being demolished.