Toews and Kane are forwards, and Johnson is a defenceman, so therefore Toews and Kane should get more points. Which of the two will score more is questionable
2007-10-08 13:58:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by J S 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I took Kane and Toews in my pool, but after watching the first two games, Kane looks to be better than described.
2007-10-08 14:18:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Toews, Kane is good, but not as good and Johnson is D so he won't be scoring as much, in theory, as Kane or Toews.
2007-10-09 10:18:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by tboneund 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Toews. As good as I think Kane will be, Toews has franchise player written all over him. Their points won't be too far off of each other, though.
2007-10-09 01:08:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by bkemp2001 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Personally i think Johnathon Toews is amazing and very underrated and i think he will do the best but Patrick Kane is very deadly so im not sure, its a tough one. But i doubt Johnson will rack up as much points as either of the others.
2007-10-08 13:53:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Toews. Keep an eye on Gagner for the Oil too.
2007-10-08 16:02:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by PuckDat 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Toews definitely.
2007-10-08 14:16:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by DC FURY 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm liking Kane. Savard plays him a lot and with Havlat out, this could be his Lou Gehrig chance
2007-10-08 15:14:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Canadian Biology Man 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
maybe taves is like havglass, always coming up lame. but I think he's got potential Yzerman numbers.
2007-10-08 16:58:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋