Shouldn't it be the other way around, I mean since George Bush has been in office al-queda is larger, and more organized then ever. If hillary is elected and we leave Iraq then the terrorists have no enemy to fight, so wouldn't it make more sense that they'd back someone to keep fueling this fire?
2007-10-08 12:12:55 · 6 answers · asked by MattMan 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
If you're talking about Al-Queda specifically, I don't think they have much stake in it. They generally don't like women and having a woman leader of the US would probably just give them more reason to hate us. It certainly wouldn't go over well in the mideast, which would make things much easier for them to recruit new jihadists. But at the end of the day, I don't think they care who is in charge of America they just want israel gone and american troops off of muslim soil.
I think the terrorists would be pretty cool with the republican party by now. They've given them the attention and support that they need in the middle east. Think about it...you don't become a terrorist to do it in secret. The whole point of terrorism is making news headlines and gaining attention for your cause, whatever it is. And if there's one thing the republicans have done, it's make the terrorist and their cause the focus of our daily lives for the last 6 years.
2007-10-08 12:18:30 · answer #1 · answered by joel 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think that you think that terrorism is bigger or larger is because of 9/11, they can't hide in the shadows any more. They tried in 1994 with the WTC, but I hav'nt found a Democrat that can seem to remember that. Billary between the two of them couldn't come up with a plan to get rid of them, and subsequently let them slip through their fingers. People always seem to want to flog Bush about this, but all he's doing is picking up the pieces that Hill/Bill left after they cleaned out the White House. He's doing something about getting rid of terrorism, Putting them on notice that their kind are not needed in this world.
2007-10-08 13:26:42 · answer #2 · answered by Brett C 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ya but when they killed the Nazi's it didn't make them multiply ..how is this possible , pardner ? ESPECIALLY , GIVEN THE FACT THAT those terrorists you speak of already tried to level the WTC with bombs when MR.&Mrs.CLINTON were in the Oval Office . 1994 ring any bells for ya ? I simply don't believe that George Bush has extraordinary powers to organize terrorists . Dude, he's getting rid of terrorists . As for terrorists supporting Hillary..all I know is al -Jazeera paid for a recent poll to favor democrats . Did George W. influence al-Jazeera ? Will we ever know ?
2007-10-08 12:35:53 · answer #3 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Quit trying to pin the idea of terrorism on Hillary. Every knows that George Bush is the architect of the whole terrorist movement because it helps to create wars which is supposed to good for his economic outlook or in other words "he and his friends pockets"..........
2007-10-08 12:28:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Considering how close the bin Laden family and the Bush family are, ya gotta wonder. Granted, Osama bin Laden is a grey sheep of the family, and he has numerous siblings and half-siblings, but it doesn't look good to be linked so closely.
2007-10-08 15:46:23 · answer #5 · answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
they believe she is a pushover, how badly mistaken they are.
2007-10-08 13:45:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋