http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,300005,00.html
http://www.kxmc.com/News/Nation/169285.asp
WASHINGTON — Republican lawmakers blasted Sen. Hillary Clinton Monday after learning that the campaign is taking advice from Sandy Berger, a former top aide to President Bill Clinton who admitted stealing classified documents and disposing them.
This man is a traitor.
For the liberals who love to use the b.s. argument I use conservative TRUTH REVEALING SOURCES, (MOST liberals seem to love to hide and dodge the truth and reality) I have uncluded one source from Fox and one from KXMC.
Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls. We've just learned that Hilarly has been endorsed by the Islamofascists:http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57970
And now, Hilarly is using Sany Burglar as an advisor.
What does that tell you about who you should be casting a ballot for? THNIK ABOUT IT!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
2007-10-08 11:25:07 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So is it any surprise to you that the topic isn't even a part of the conversation on Main-Stream TV news?
And the left say the news isn't biased!
2007-10-09 04:54:05 · answer #1 · answered by Philip H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ok - another rant filled with the sort of lies the hard right need to stoop to in order to make any point.
Sandy Berger did not plead guilty to disposing of anything. He pled guilty to removing and retaining copies of documents. The lead prosecutor has stated that no items were destroyed and only copies were taken. If you have evidence to the contrary I suggest you contact theJustice Department.
And if you are advocating that the American public should all vote solely on what some terrorist says - this really represents a sad day for conservatives.
2007-10-08 22:14:09 · answer #2 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
This is no surprise to anyone, right or left. Sen Clinton has been involved with a lot worse people. Do you remember the murder of Vince Foster?
I Cr 13;8a
2007-10-08 21:38:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i read on a post here - someone wrote along the lines, "the only group she hasn't pandered to is the prison population" (or something like that)..... now she's *all* her bases covered! (hsu & sandy being only the latest!... you too can have a job in our administration!). will she have that mcclellan guy be in charge of childrens services next?
2007-10-08 20:40:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How low the once great democrate party has falled,next she'll hire Charles Manson to advise her on crime prevention.
2007-10-08 18:40:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Re: Sandy Berger... I find it very amusing how Berger is a traitor yet your ilk will constantly defend lawbreakers such as:
Scooter Libby - Perjury
Oliver North - Iran Contra
Alberto Gonzalez - Illegal firings, lying under oath
Bush Administration - Intentional deletion of thousands of emails to avoid them going to the National Archives
Dick Cheney - Intentionally setting in motion the outing of a CIA operative
George W. Bush - Flagrant disregard for FISA laws.
2007-10-08 18:49:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
I heard you the first time, I guess you'll post this about 20 more times.
So by logic they say they endorse Hillary because they do not want her elected....why, because they fear her? If your enemy endorses a candidate they must know that they hurt that persons chances right...So in order to cause them harm you must vote for her. any true patriotic American would have to vote for Hillary because the terrorists want to keep her from being elected.
2007-10-08 18:33:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
The libs will say...'but that's old news' like they did when tons of enriched uranium were found in Iraq.
2007-10-08 18:48:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
What's your question? It seems like the instructions of this site are pretty simple and straight-forward, yet people are having a hell of hard time figuring it out. By the way, who was it that blew Valerie Plame's cover?
Edit: Gotta second bromide_staining's opinion.
2007-10-08 18:34:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
You are not looking at the other side of the issue. Instead of calling it BS why don't you actually look into what you are saying and give the other side a chance.
2007-10-08 18:35:52 · answer #10 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋