2007-10-08 11:11:13 · 13 answers · asked by Thursday 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No.
You should remember that in 1996 the Barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1998, the bombing of the US Embassy in Kenya and Tanzania, and finally in 2000, the attack against the USS Cole.
Bill and Hillary did a poor job. Also, 9/11/200 was in planning stages durring the final years of the Clinton Administration.
They were not doing a job going after the bad guys and hurt them because they sacrifice America's security for peace in the Middle East. This was wrong.
2007-10-08 11:21:15 · answer #1 · answered by David_the_Great 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No I don't believe that if Hillary was President, she would do a good job of fighting the War On Terror. This being said, I don't see any presidential candidate who will really do an effective job in fighting the War On Terror.
However, I, and I am sure millions of other Americans, want to know exactly who the US military is fighting in the War On Terror. I believe this war is actually against Al Qaeda, not against all the terrorist groups.
Just so everyone understands this, Al Qaeda is more of a global ideology rather than a specific group of people, which means there is no real way to win the war.
Could someone please answer this:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiPOefnTsglNbIivWiLKODrsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071007194041AAIHXR1
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071008150806AAnGBh0&pa=FYd1D2bwHTHwLbtuHOs5SaDFmwsv4KIy20GiFZ2BUcNE6w--&paid=asked&msgr_status=
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071008211244AA7vFJg&pa=FYd1D2bwHTHwLbtvFOk6R5q0AyW2pEn9h_X.AP8.o1Mrjg--&paid=asked&msgr_status=
2007-10-08 18:19:43 · answer #2 · answered by lordofthegods13 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think that Sen. Clinton will do a tremendous job cleaning up the mess that Bush leaves behind and will do a much better job of dealing with terrorism. Bill will be an asset to her in this endeavor, no doubt.
2007-10-08 19:04:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes.. Remember Bush ignored the PDB which warned him an attack using our Airlines as missiles to destroy our buildings weeks prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Had Bush not ignored the PDB, he could have tightened security and banned all implements used for cutting as well as all liquids then and September 11, 2001 would not have happened.
They have Airport Security footage of a Security Screener taking box cutters from four passengers.. Then the tape shows this same screener running up to the passengers and giving the box cutters back to them..
2007-10-08 18:27:53 · answer #4 · answered by Tigger 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes. Bill got closer to catching Osama Bin Laden than Bush ever did.
Also, the Clinton administration warned the Bush administration about the threat of Al Quada , but they chose to ignore it until after 9/11.
2007-10-08 18:17:12 · answer #5 · answered by Amy 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
IN 1998 BIN LADEN WAS IN AFGHANISTAN......THE CIA AN FBI WERE GOING IN TO AFGHANISTAN TO CAPTURE BIN LADEN, AT THE REQUEST OF PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON......BEFORE THE CAPTURE WAS GOING TO TAKE PLACE THE CIA AN FBI RECEIVED A MESSAGE FROM JANET RENO TELLING THEM THE CAPTURE OF BIN LADEN HAS BEEN CANCELED!.......NO HILLARY CLINTON !,NO BILL CLITNON!.....BIN LADEN HIM SELF CALLED BILL CLINTON A COWARD AN WEAK PRESIDENT, HILLARY AN BILL CLINTON ARE LOSERS OF THE WORST FORM.......
2007-10-08 18:42:31 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, but they would do a good job again of taking away more gun rights.
2007-10-08 18:39:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, Bush is not our end all and be all saviour for the war on terror.
2007-10-08 18:14:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Bilary didn't and could not do a good job on anything
2007-10-08 19:07:49 · answer #9 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I don't think so.I really don't think we are ready for Bilary to run the country.
2007-10-08 18:21:42 · answer #10 · answered by Ron Burgundy 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋