The simple answer is that there is not enough energy in lightning to be useful. As many people pointed out, there is also the little problem of harnessing it... but that is not as big a deal as most seem to think.
Lightning is a discharge of electrical charge stored between clouds and the earth. It can even be triggered on purpose with a metal wire shot into the cloud by a small rocket or by using an ionizing beam (UV laser will probably work). Once triggered, the current flowing through the discharge channel can, for instance, be converted into heat in a large resistor, which would then boil water, create steam and drive a turbine.
Many of the other answers you got seem to imply we have to store the electricity in a capacitor... we don't, we only have to store the energy in the lightning and release it more gradually. Steam will do this just fine.
But even if we wanted to store the electricity, the required capacitor would not be that awfully large. Something on the order of a freight container would probably be enough... see, there is really not that much energy in lightning and cabinet sized MJ capacitor banks are being used in many areas of physics and technology. Put a few of those in series and you are there.
If one did that, a very old circuit made of gas discharge and mechanical switches and these large capacitor banks could be used to get convert the large voltage/small charge into a much smaller voltage and larger charge of equal energy content, which could then be converted to AC by an electronic converter. The circuit is called a Marx-Generator and is usually used to "create lightning" rather than to catch it, but it is, in theory and with a little bit of though also in practice, reversible:
http://www.kronjaeger.com/hv/hv/pro/marx/index.html
So why aren't we? Because there is not much energy in lightning. A single solar panel will produce more electricity between two storms than the most sophisticated "lightning catcher" could.
So why bother? Rube Goldberg came up with much more fun machines that make just as much sense as the lightning catcher.
PS: Somebody did the math and the results are really pathetic:
http://plaza.ufl.edu/rakov/FAQ.html
You really only get 1-10MJ out of the lightning bolt... which is pretty much what I had based my capacitor size on. In comparison: 1 gallon of gasoline = 100MJ! So one lightning hit into the lightning catcher and you get the equivalent of a cup full of gas. Is that worth a container sized machine costing millions of dollars? Probably not... at least not until gas prices are somewhere around $10000,- a gallon.
2007-10-08 11:38:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
14⤊
3⤋
Harnessing Lightning
2016-11-14 19:14:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
Why can't we harness the electricity in lightning?
Would it be possible to connect the lightning rods in buildings to the electricity grid or some kind of capacitor, so that when lightning strikes we can harness it?
2015-08-06 17:50:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Several problems limit the usefulness of this idea. Here are three of them.
1. Lighting can deliver millions of Watts for only a short moment. This involves way to much charge for even the biggest capacitors to avoid burning up.
2. Lightning is not predictable in any meaningful sense, and unpredictability means unreliability which is bad for when someone is dependent on the power flow.
3. There are too many cheaper, easier and more reliable power sources around!
2007-10-08 11:17:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by 1,1,2,3,3,4, 5,5,6,6,6, 8,8,8,10 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Harnessing lightning is like trying to catch five gallons of water into a thimble. If you try to pour the five gallons all in at one shot, which is what lightning does, you can't do it. If you pour the water slowly enough you can catch it in the thimble and transfer it to a bigger container. A storage system has not been built that can handle a lightning strike surge of power.
2007-10-08 11:18:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by puppets48744 4
·
4⤊
3⤋
Ever heard of Nikola Tesla? It has been done, but since it doesn't turn a $$$profit$$$, it hasn't become a means of big energy supply.
Tesla Coil....
2007-10-08 11:12:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by narcissexual 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Your question has no answer. We do harness the electricity in lightning but as you can guess its a bit tricky.
2007-10-08 11:13:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Punchy 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
--->> Tips---> https://trimurl.im/g83/why-can-39-t-we-harness-the-electricity-in-lightning
2015-08-04 16:26:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, it's probably possible, but it's too unreliable... you won't have enough to power things, and you won't know where to collect it at for distribution.
2007-10-08 12:20:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by justin r 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
It's technically possible, but the cost would be too much.
2007-10-08 11:16:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Always Hopeful 6
·
4⤊
2⤋