That's a shame for America and shameful for the media!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071008/ap_po/2008_iowa_poll
It's all about the corrupt money leaders and nothing about the real American leaders, which is what we need!
2007-10-08 10:49:40 · 9 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I wish ugly fat people would eat their twinky's and keep their treasonous opinions to themselves!
Really
2007-10-08 10:55:38 · update #1
That's just it, they don't mention Ron Paul at all which proves they want another 4-8 years of this nightmare by going with those who are actually running things in our Nation on the fall!
On the fall economically and militarily!
Romney - Guiliani and Hillary are all part of this Middle East war madness and it will end with Paul!
But you war mongers keep ignoring his campaign!
Go ahead he has now earned 5 million for his campaign and all of it coming from real American voters - not these backpocket Lobbyist campaign drivers!
2007-10-08 11:01:09 · update #2
The media likes the current arrangement of the 1st amendment. They own it! Rather than the people. Having Ron Paul as president would restore this country to a real free press and that causes them to want to eliminate this guy.
2007-10-08 11:16:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
What proof do you have that Paul won Iowa? Or is it just something you've conjured up in your mind (PS., I too am a Ron Paul admirer and would like nothing more than to see him win the nomination).
2007-10-08 17:59:34 · answer #2 · answered by abdiver12 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
So where's this poll you claim Ron Paul won? Let me guess, another straw poll, or is this one an imaginary straw poll? Here's the latest and Ron Paul isn't even on their radar.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ia/iowa_republican_caucus-207.html
2007-10-08 19:40:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
What are you spouting? Romney beat Ron Paul (and everybody else) in Iowa.
Paul won the statewide straw poll here in Maryland, though. It's a completely different state, though...we don't grow much corn here.
2007-10-08 17:53:53 · answer #4 · answered by skip742 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
You really should read the links you post. The article does not even mention Ron Paul. Looks like he tanked it even worse than McCain...
2007-10-08 17:54:16 · answer #5 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
because ron paul actually gives a hoot about the constitution.
2007-10-08 18:02:47 · answer #6 · answered by uberknowing 1 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Actually, I got the impression that Mitt Romney beat everyone in the poll numbers in Iowa. He spent a lot of money to do so from what I recall.
Could someone please answer this:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiPOefnTsglNbIivWiLKODrsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071007194041AAIHXR1
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071008150806AAnGBh0&pa=FYd1D2bwHTHwLbtuHOs5SaDFmwsv4KIy20GiFZ2BUcNE6w--&paid=asked&msgr_status=
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071008211244AA7vFJg&pa=FYd1D2bwHTHwLbtvFOk6R5q0AyW2pEn9h_X.AP8.o1Mrjg--&paid=asked&msgr_status=
2007-10-08 18:33:14 · answer #7 · answered by lordofthegods13 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ron Paul did not beat anyone. The Iowa caucuses have not been held yet. I won't vote for Ron Paul.
2007-10-08 17:52:47 · answer #8 · answered by regerugged 7 · 4⤊ 8⤋
Ron Paul does not have a clue on lots of the issues!
2007-10-08 17:52:31 · answer #9 · answered by Constitutional Watchdog 7 · 4⤊ 11⤋