Rethink on human-animal hybrid experiments
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=paEmbryo_mon19_human_experiments&show_article=1
2007-10-08 10:01:24 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The article reads like an H.G.Wells novel.
2007-10-08 10:09:32 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed Bob 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes
http://www.truewordtoday.blogspot.com.
2007-10-08 17:04:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but not the science in the article.
The only limits that should be placed on science are those already in place by scientific regulatory committees. The govt is not qualified to make decisions on this matter, other scientists are. The people are not qualified either, nor are the churches. If the research should not be done, it will be difficult to find funding. If funding is found it will be stopped anyway by the scientific community's leaders.
2007-10-08 17:13:25 · answer #3 · answered by Showtunes 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's difficult to stop research if there is a market for the product being investigated - ESPECIALLY by the military
Examples:
Nuclear weapons
nerve gas
Biological weapons
All things the world could do without.
2007-10-08 17:10:20 · answer #4 · answered by captain_koyk 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is a very scary development, and I think it should be stopped.
I highly suspect that there are already ape-human hybrids alive somewhere in the world already, being forced to live in cages and experimented on. God help us all.
2007-10-08 17:12:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Its a tough answer... I don't feel the government should muck in scientific progression. Though it would be comforting to find scientists who showed restraint.
2007-10-08 17:11:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I like this quote.. though I don't know where it comes from.
"If knowledge is the key to all doors, may it be held in the hands of wisdom"
2007-10-08 17:05:05 · answer #7 · answered by pip 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Even if you put boundries on scientifical research... the human imagination is still infinate.
2007-10-08 17:05:12 · answer #8 · answered by Sam 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes it should
2007-10-08 17:11:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Only if people's lives (not embryo's lives) are in danger.
2007-10-08 17:18:05 · answer #10 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋