I notice many of the feminist women here claim that men are ugly, unattractive, and that the male figure is "not as aesthetically beautiful as the female figure". Then there are the pseudo-poet feminists here that talk about how they are not attracted to a man's looks, but rather his "mind", "soul", "spiritual adherence to nature and Mother Earth" and "consolidation with the universe".
I just would like to know why it seems that most feminists here are not attracted to men physically.
2007-10-08
09:32:05
·
21 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Gender Studies
zybagirl: You cannot determine one's physical attraction by their answers. Next.
Also, it is not my goal to please or appease misandrist feminists, for they are the enemy.
2007-10-08
10:37:34 ·
update #1
because most "feminists" are lesbians, these are the radicals though. These are the feminists that give real feminists a bad name. I'm a feminist, people are so screwed up over what the definition of feminism really is. All it means is women and men being treated equally. A lot of these radical "feminists" are just man haters that think woman are higher up, they're idiots. They think when a woman is a mother it's degrading to a woman, they think when a woman cooks a meal its degrading, to me it sounds like they aren't embracing their womanhood. I'm with you on what you're saying but just know that those women aren't real feminists.
oh... and I do find men attractive, I like the real manly men. :)
2007-10-08 10:22:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Agnostic 4
·
3⤊
8⤋
I'm a feminist, and I think men are hot. My fiance gets me hot and bothered all the time.
Yeah, I've heard people say that male package looks gross, actually, I don't think I've heard anyone say otherwise.
I would suggest maybe the women who declared they were attracted to the mind/soul were trying to break away from the stereotype that people only care about looks. I love my fiances mind and soul but that doesn't mean I don't like the way he looks either.
Sorry, feeling a little silly today.
2007-10-08 09:41:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Manny 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Though it seems that you're pulling this question out of your...hat, because I've not seen any feminist say such a thing, I'll answer.
I'm not sexually attracted to the female form, though it's beautiful to me in it's own way. I'm sexually attracted to the male form, but no amount of sexiness can ever compensate for stupidity. I'm lucky to have a husband who's beautiful on the inside and out. I wouldn't settle for less.
2007-10-08 09:52:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
i think the male body is just as beautiful as the female body. anyone that calls the male body "ugly" or "gross" is being downright sexist. the male body is just as pleasing to the eye as the female body--only difference is, the media promotes the idea that the female body is an object of beauty, while the male body is functional. if women were honest with themselves (if they are straight, anyway), they will have to admit they find something attractive physically about men--otherwise, why would you be sleeping with them?
i rarely admire a man for his body alone, though. i am not attracted to a man unless i like his personality. this is just a fact. even the rare celebrity i find attractive is a great actor, and usually pretty quirky looking to boot. what i'm saying is, i find the male form attractive, but NOT the "chippendales" beefy male form pushed upon women as the pinnacle of male beauty. the mind is infinitely sexier than the body, i believe.
2007-10-08 09:46:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kinz 4
·
6⤊
3⤋
Yes of course.
The male figure is way more beautiful and aesthetically pleasing than the female figure.
2007-10-08 10:39:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by AAA 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
well that seems rather silly to me, a lot of females are at least a little feminist including myself. We may not be full fledged or anything but... well that's not my point, lol. Women who are feminists are usually all about "womens rights" not anti-man, that sounds more amazon to me, and finding men less attractive than women sounds lesbian (no offense, but it's true).... idk what those women are thinking, and they may be attracted to men and be dramaticizing to make a point, which i tend to do often haha. Well i really don't know if my explanation helped you any but i hope so =)
2007-10-08 09:51:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by paint_it_black1321 2
·
8⤊
1⤋
I'm attracted to my partner. I find his intellect, sense of humor, personality, looks, and much more attractive.
When attracted to people, things like their mind/"soul"/sense of humor really do matter a great deal to me. If some one is smart, funny, and charming on top of being a good person, he becomes pretty attractive. If someone has no sense of humor and seems like an awful person even if they look like, say Brad Pitt, I wouldn't be attracted to them...
That being said, there are, of course, physical features I like in men...
2007-10-08 10:24:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I gotta say I agree with the female body being beautiful but not enough for me to want to roll over and wake up to every day for the rest of my life.
I do find men attractive but I'm very particular in taste.
2007-10-08 09:54:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lioness 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
Of course they find men attractive.
I would, however, guess that if your statements towards women in real life are as derogatory as they are on this forum, you won't find many women - feminist or not - attracted to you personally and might therefore have a rather distorted point of view.
2007-10-08 11:13:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ithilien 3
·
5⤊
3⤋
Ah, Lycra – I find men attractive!
The male body has an aesthetic quality that I’m sooooo attracted to. For me to NOT be attracted to a man has more to do with his personality.
2007-10-08 09:37:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rainbow 6
·
5⤊
3⤋