what are the central features of biological theories of crime?

Answer 1

Social status, gender inequality, competition and tendencies to violence. Genetics.

Answer 2

Well I don't know what social scientist say, but I think my life of crime would qualify me as an expert. Just kidding. They would say it's mostly environmental. For instance, cells in a petre dish become muscle, bone or fat tissues by the environment. We are programmed out of our own personality by three, six by some authorities. We are slavishly run by that and progressive progamming. Not entirely, but entirely too much to believe. Such that they're questioning if we have any free will. Given that's the latest research, we can get around it with the intuition, emotional intelligence and the right information. Why? Are you thinking of going into a life of crime? Information realigns the neurons. Fortunately we're still children emotionaly, so there's something left to program, like EQ. If we're entirely mechanical, how is it we have any control. There has to be a controler that's not a machine, and we all sense that. The knowledge of this type is always known ahead of time by commpn sense, a sense of things that's held in common, but science just takes forever to explain and prove it to the satisfaction of cynics.

Answer 3

the respond on your question lies in information the roots of theorizing approximately organic and organic strategies to deviance. the 1st rather scientific learn of crime grew to become into accomplished in Italy contained in the 1700's by means of Cesare Lombroso. He in comparison criminals to infantrymen and located that criminals had specific actual traits, collectively with extra physique hair and stated foreheadridges. Lombroso then posited that making use of the traits he discovered, we are able to perceive criminals earlier they dedicate crimes. making use of slightly elementary sense, you will discover why this might create a stir, and why sociologists might oppose such recommendations. generally, sociologists dislike any organic and organic motives of any habit for 2 substantial motives. First, they study such motives as diminishing the premises of cultural impact that are foundational to the self-discipline. 2d, as a results of fact traditionally organic and organic motives have been used to oppress people. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, those criticisms are the two lost. First, it rather is a classification blunders to ascribe any habit just to surroundings or to biology. the two count. 2d, the mere certainty that organic and organic motives have been utilized in a undeniable way contained in the previous does no longer imply that they are going to consistently be used that way. there is credible info of a few organic and organic predispositions in direction of deviant habit. reliable examples are analyze of organic and organic little ones of criminals who're raised in non-criminal families. Such little ones nevertheless have an extra suitable danger of deviance. another info is the invention of genes that impact hormones linked with aggression. there is likewise substantial info from cognitive neuroscience that exhibits organic and organic correlates to deviance. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, in all of those situations, those behaviors are show up basically particularly environmental circumstances. the two count. in certainty, all of us be attentive to that Lombroso's test grew to become into fatally incorrect, and it rather is in many circumstances spoke of as a reason at the back of rejecting all organic and organic motives of deviance. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, this may well be a logical fallacy. certainly,