I doubt there was a money line on the 'SC-Stanford game, but if there had been, it would have been about 100 to 1.
The spread was 40 and 1/2 points.
Bookies will establish the moneyline (aka odds) to attract equivalent money on each side so a 4 to 1 favorite would attract $4 for each $1 bet on the underdog.
That said, the spread will be off by 40 or more points about once every 50 -75 games. It's rare, but not extraordinary. For example, Utah beat the spread by 50 in its win over UCLA -- its just that UCLA wasn't the No. 2 team in the nation and wasn't favored by 40+ points.
To be off by 40+ on the Stanford side (as opposed to the SC side) should occur one-half as much or once every 100-150 games. Therefore, if the moneyline followed the true odds, the moneyline would have been some place around 100-1.
SC just had the bad luck of facing an underrated Stanford team and having really bad day (a once in a decade bad day) at the office.
2007-10-08 12:50:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Frst Grade Rocks! Ω 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Since the point spread was +40, you would get 40/1 odds on your money, so in this case, every dollar you put on Stanford would pay you a $40 return. In essence, if you bet $10 on Stanford, you got paid $400. If you bet $100 on Stanford, you got paid $4000, etc.
2007-10-08 08:35:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by kitchens68 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there was no money line for this game. however, whoever kitchens is, they are totally wrong. just because a spread is 40 points, that doesnt mean that the odds are 40 - 1. that would have meant the money line would have been +4000 for stanford. i have never seen a money line for a football game that is that much. and i doubt that anybody else has either. dont listen to this clown. he needs to know what hes talking about before answering.
2007-10-09 09:35:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by johnny j 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
money line usc stanford game
2016-02-02 10:17:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Vilhelm 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
+41 was the point spread.
2007-10-08 08:03:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋