English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

It's like a snowball effect. Some high-positioned people obviously bought into that tripe and influenced a lot of people with the simple minded viewpoint it espouses.

Unlike the gullible sheep who always see a conspiracy afoot whenever the creation of wealth is mentioned, it would take someone with a far greater intellect to understand (or at least appreciate) the writings Dinesh D'Sousa.

For example, every Liberal denounces the supposed evils of colonialism. They will cite with absolute assuredness that colonialism made the West rich at the expense of the colonized nations. That simply is not true. If you don't agree, read Dinesh's article shown in the link below. Here is an exerpt:

"Colonialism was the transmission belt that brought to Asia, Africa, and South America the blessings of Western civilization. Many of those cultures continue to have serious problems of tyranny, tribal and religious conflict, poverty, and underdevelopment, but that is not due to an excess of Western influence; rather, it is due to the fact that those countries are insufficiently Westernized. Sub-Saharan Africa, which is probably in the worst position, has been described by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan as "a cocktail of disasters." That is not because colonialism in Africa lasted so long, but because it lasted a mere half-century. It was too short a time to permit Western institutions to take firm root. Consequently, after their independence, most African nations have retreated into a kind of tribal barbarism that can be remedied only with more Western influence, not less. Africa needs more Western capital, more technology, more rule of law, and more individual freedom."

**************************************************
HA!!!! I love catching lazy Libs. Perhaps 2 minutes after posting this, I had already gotten two thumbs down, meaning that neither of those intellectual lightweights bothered to read the link. Your vote means nothing.

2007-10-08 07:49:11 · answer #1 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 2 4

until eventually an adolescent has a nicely recommended conservative mentor, they don't stand a raffle of being the rest yet a liberal. they are indoctrinated into that type of questioning at school and it is reinforced on television, interior the information and interior the entertainment they watch. the only ones who capture directly to what has been carried out to them via the time they are youthful adults, are the main clever and perceptive who comprehend that they have got been spoonfed the liberal lie. transforming into to be a member of the militia additionally provides them a useful outlook on existence and the worldwide concern. i replaced right into a democrat as quickly as I joined the Air tension. i presumed that way for almost 2 many years. via that component I were worldwide, and had talked with some rather clever people approximately politics, and that i began out to be conscious that liberal politicians advised countless lies. not the type of popular lies that the left accuses Republican politicians of telling, yet particular lies that I knew from my very very own journey weren't authentic. The Clinton years somewhat solidified my opinion of liberal politicians, and then I found out the origins of recent liberalism and their time table grew to alter into crystal sparkling to me. If I had not had the earnings of my useful education, i might by no potential have seen the gentle. I see a worldwide of distinction in liberal politicians and liberal electorate. The electorate only have not had any stories that instruct them that they are being misled. The politicians are a various tale. they are working from a particular and distinctive plan, and have not have been given any regard for the electorate, different than wanting the votes.

2016-10-06 07:53:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

America 's Plutocracy preys on the weaker and less fortunate members of society. Since America 's founding, they have leveraged their economic power to dominate the government and the media, the vehicles through which they advance their avaricious agenda. In early American history, they employed an imperialistic foreign policy to ensure the expansion of US boundaries and interests. Along the way, they virtually annihilated the Native American population. Once they had attained as much of the North American continent as they were able, they used "Manifest Destiny" and the "Communist threat" as rationalizations to invade other nations (i.e., The Philippines) support ruthless dictators in other nations (Augusto Pinochet in Chile) who have tortured and killed millions. Recently, legislation favoring corporations over workers and consumers has sharply diminished the power of labor unions and opportunities for small entrepreneurs, while historically, corporations have maimed and killed their employees and their customers with hazardous working conditions and unsafe products. The wealthy elite class has dominated American politics via dynasties like the Bush clan and the Kennedy family. The predominance of regressive over progressive taxes has virtually guaranteed that the majority of America 's riches remains in the hands of the Plutocrats. Throughout American history, the Plutocracy has severely victimized black Americans, through enslavement and through ongoing gross social injustices. Latin American immigrants face open discrimination for their language and cultural differences while armed vigilantes calling themselves "Minute Men" now patrol the US-Mexican border. Other racial minorities, some religious groups, Gays and the disabled also face discrimination and suppression of rights at the hands of the white, "straight", "Christian" Plutocracy dominating the government and media in the United States .

2007-10-08 08:01:45 · answer #3 · answered by somber 3 · 1 1

Personally, I was influenced by the Constitution of the United States of America.

2007-10-08 07:34:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 9 2

I'd say a lot of us, liberal or not, were mostly influenced by the biased structure of our school history textbooks, which excluded a lot of American history in regards to women and minorities.

2007-10-08 07:37:36 · answer #5 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 5 1

No, they were influenced by listening to Rush Limbaugh. He turned them into liberals with his hatred of his fellow Americans.

2007-10-08 07:46:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I'd attempt to answer your question if there were any thought behind it or truth in it. I have one for you. Do you think you'll ever be a liberal or a conservative, or do you plan on spending your life as a troll?

2007-10-08 07:50:31 · answer #7 · answered by socrates 6 · 2 0

Howard Zinn is hardly a communist. His views are similar to Teddy Roosevelt's. A fair deal is not communism.

2007-10-08 07:38:22 · answer #8 · answered by sudonym x 6 · 4 1

This Major Deek, whose avatar shows a man with a Sampan on his head, is about as smart as a box of hammers.

2007-10-08 08:22:39 · answer #9 · answered by Polyhistor 7 · 2 1

You mean to say that "Young Liberals" can Read !!
What a revelation !
Next you'll be saying that they have clear and lucid ideas about which party they prefer ! Then what will we have ??
A democracy ?
Why that's absurd !

2007-10-08 07:52:57 · answer #10 · answered by thehermanator2003 4 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers