Why is a drug dealer gets a longer sentence in a federal prison but a murderer then a murderer?

Question

Why does a bank robber get a longer sentence then a murderer,child molestor or rapist?Why does some one who is convicted of stautory rape some times gets the same or a longer sentence then some one did agrivated rape?Why cant the worst crimes get the longest sentence and every sentence could be the same range for the same crime and higher crimes get the highest penalty.
Im starting to get sick of the fact that diffrent states have diffrent laws and the federal goverment had diffrent laws.I read about federalist and anti federalist.Im now starting to agree with federalist idea. also depends on the judge and the jury.I wish there were sentences that highesst range that the judge can give fits the crime not to long or to short.It also has to do with the over crowding of the prisons whitch wastes tax payers money.Why cant we leave the longest sentence go to the worst of the worst because i dont want my taxes to go to low risk offenders serving a life sentence i rather it be put on the bad

Answer 1

Actually most states have adopted a structured sentencing scheme that takes into account prior record and seriousness of crime. What at first blush may appear to be differential sentencing may in fact be due to previous criminal history and/or aggravating mitigating circumstances in the current crime. Many times the general public are unaware of these relevant facts. If you are unhappy with the sentencing scheme in your state, contact your state legislators to lobby to have it changed.

Answer 2

Because the world is not fair and there is no common sense left.
Doesn't make much sense but the whole system is run by money. If you have money you can usually get off with less. Jurys are paid off and/or selected.
Drug dealers should have the longest sentence of all right now. Almost all violent crimes can be traced back to drugs right now, mostly meth.
It would seem that with the DNA technology that is available you could be sure that you don't jail an innocent man but sadly corruption is still out there in some places and people could get framed. If you could be sure to get the right person, I think the death penalty should be in place for random murders, rapes, and child molestors.

Answer 3

A major issue is the mandatory sentencing guidelines under the War on Drugs. If found guilty, the minimum sentence for a first time offender holding a small amount of any drug can easily be longer than that of a first time murderer. Victimless crimes should never receive longer sentences, but the federal gov't dictates that for some insane reason, and theyve screwed everything up.

Answer 4

ok, let's get things straight one by one.

First of all, you get sentenced to a federal prison if you have committed crimes across the borders of a state, which means the FBI gets involved.

Secondly, cases of murder differ. So do cases of robbery, assault, rape, or any kind of felony. There are mitigating and/or aggravating circumstances in any case. The sentence is decided based on those circumstances and the ability of the defense and the prosecution of convincing the jury of either story line.

In the case of drug-dealing and trafficking networks, the implications of this crime are worse than a single homicide case; this becomes a matter of organized crime and the punishment for that differs. Not only one person suffers from this felons, but a large number of people. Plus the charges add up, they can include extortion, fraud, robbery, assault, drug-dealing, etc. If you deal with a case of single homicide, it can either be third degree (negligent homicide), or second degree (crime of passion), or first degree (premeditated murder); so the charges vary depending on the "criminal intent" of the perpetrator.

Answer 5

Emilio G Mexico has the main important hypocrites you’ll ever meet: the only “injustice” there is in this occasion is that Mexico has placed its electorate up for adoption to the optimal bidder. somewhat than working to strengthen the financial gadget of Mexico so the electorate can artwork and thrive of their native land, Mexican officers are speedy to take a seat on their sorry butts and whine that u . s . a . is unjust to foreign places felons. attempt sneaking into Mexico and pulling off a million/2 of the crimes Ms. Arellano dedicated right here. How some distance do you think of you will possibly get? approximately as some distance because of the fact the closest reformatory may well be my wager. as a rely of actuality, Ms. Arellano could drop to her knees and thank God that she isn’t serving time for her crimes and replaced into in basic terms sent domicile. yet somewhat than being punished for her crimes, Elvira Arellano is being dealt with like a queen in Mexico, this is just one extra blatant sign of ways corrupt Mexico, and its government, has exchange into. once you place criminals on a nationwide pedestal, some thing is very incorrect consisting of your government. Mexico desires to take a reliable, confusing examine out Mexico, somewhat than criticizing u . s . a ..

Answer 6

Each state has sentencing guidelines for crimes. And there are mitigating factors, extenuating factors, etc. that get judges to give the most or the least in the range.

If people would just quit committing crimes, we wouldn't have this problem.

Answer 7

Life isn't fair. Don't do these things. Then you don't have to worry.