On "Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace" Nancy Pelosi said "God's will be done". Does this mean the she believes that Homosexuality is an abomination? According to the Bible this is true. Or is she just lying to gain supportt from her base?
2007-10-08 07:20:46 · 14 answers · asked by wayne 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Those who say that the Bible does not condemn homosexuality are engaged in wishful thinking. Genesis, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, 2 Peter, Matthew, Romans and 1 Timothy all deal with God's hatred of that perversion. God loves homosexuals, the same as he loves everybody else in the world, but he despises the practice. Some denominations, Episcopalians for one example, choose to ignore those scriptures for the convenience of their liberal views on the subject.
"Holy Cow": Maybe you'd better look at your Bible again. Here are some specific references for you:
Lev 18:22 - "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination."
Lev 20:13 - "If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them."
I'll let you look up the other scriptures that specifically condemn homosexuality in no uncertain terms: 2 Pet 2:4-6, 2 Pet 2: 6-10, Rom 1:26 & 27, 1 Cor 6:9, and 1 Tim 1:10.
Liberals Love America: Your lack of knowledge about translations of the Bible is astounding. All reputable translations, including the NIV and NJKV are translated directly from the original text, not from other modern translations.
2007-10-08 07:39:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Pelosi probably doesn't believe that homosexuality is an abomination, and neither do I.
Homosexuality is not a sin, why do I say such things?
1st off, the Bible, especially in newer translations, has been corrupted by people with a personal agenda. Admonishments of homosexuality pop-up in newer versions in places where they did not exist in older translations.
Take 1st Timothy 1:10 for example:
In the English Standard Version, completed in 2001, it goes like this:
the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers...
However in the KJV, completed in 1611, it goes like this:
For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons...
Let's go further and use the Luther Bible, published in 1545:
den Hurern, den Knabenschändern, den Menschendieben, den Lügnern, den Meineidigen...
(In English: the prostitutes, the boy violators, the people thieves, the liars, which is perjurers...)
It seems the older the translation, the less likely we'll see homosexuality appear in Scripture, at least in this verse.
Also I don't believe homosexuality is a sin because of what modern psychology has taught us. We, the general population, now know that homosexuality is not chosen, it is prescribed to us before birth. (Gays and lesbians have known this for quite a long time.) How can something be a sin if we do not have a choice in that matter?
2007-10-08 08:44:14 · answer #2 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Morals could desire to do with suitable or incorrect, reliable and evil. Values right this moment seem approximately flavor. San Francisco mixes those up because of the fact the popuilation is in many cases Liberal who have faith in 'gray" and not in black and white.
2016-10-21 11:29:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please point to the exact verse where the bible says that. If you said Leviticus, you're wrong because that's not what it says. Why is that the bible is literal when cons want it to be and figurative (like in your quote) when they want it to be. You can't have it both ways. It's either literal or it's not. Either way you just made something up because the word homosexual nor was the concept of homosexuality around when the bible was recorded.
2007-10-08 07:44:12 · answer #4 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Arent there entire passages dedicated to telling people that they dont know what God is thinking?
The homosexuality issue can be read many ways. When did Jesus get violent? Not when people sinned, only when they did so in the temple. Why not take a cue from him and lay off people. All sins are supposed to be equal in the eyes of God, why then is it ok to persecute a certain group in the name of God? Are you not a sinner too?
2007-10-08 07:26:19 · answer #5 · answered by Showtunes 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
One of your mistakes is believing that Nancy's Pelosi's base contains Christians/Jewish?
2007-10-08 07:26:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
As far as Nancy is concerned 'God's will be done' as long as it agrees with hers. *LOL* I'm not sure just how much of here base even cares what God thinks.
But then she's a Democrat. And you can't be sure which God she's referring to. Chris should have asked her to define which God and what exactly IS God's will.
2007-10-08 07:29:50 · answer #7 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Pelosi will say anything she needs to as long as she keeps getting press for it. The woman is evil.
2007-10-08 07:24:20 · answer #8 · answered by Greg 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
She bows only to the god of political power.
Anyone else quoting god is a religious right winger.
2007-10-08 07:28:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
She is a liar true and true, and even her base knows this to be true
2007-10-08 07:27:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋