English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Don’t women realize the difference between a MAN that sleeps around versus a WOMAN that sleeps around? Women complain about the “double standard” of men being called a “stud” while women get called a “wh*re” for the same behavior. But there is a HUGE difference in a man’s ability to get laid than a woman’s. The standard is different because the level of difficulty is different. Don’t women realize that it is DIFFICULT for men to get a woman to have sex?

Maybe women just don’t realize how easily they could get sex if they wanted. If you are a woman and are at least averagely-decent looking… Trust me, most guys that look at you would sleep with you if given the chance (and if they’re single OR willing to cheat).

And maybe women just don’t consider the man’s perspective of how it is such a difficult task to actually get sex from a woman.

Women, what do you think?

2007-10-08 07:19:47 · 16 answers · asked by egn18s 5 in Social Science Gender Studies

16 answers

Yes, you have noticed that a female can get sex more easily than a male (in most cases.)

Mother Nature made it so women are more populous to.keep the human species going.

Mother Nature, as far as I have determined, has put the mating call upon the males of the species to spread their seed everywhere they can.

Women have established a great aptitude to get as many males attracted to her (them) as possible.

A lot of women in this day and age have sex with guys they do not see any future with. They do it for a myriad of reasons.
Like "he's popular", or I'll get back at him (or her!)
Or I'll try to get preggo so he'll stay with me. Or I'll have sex with this guy to try to get my guy jealous.
It is sad.

But, women truly have the sexual power over men and now, I think it is working against women.
Girls are having sex with whomever just because they can. Ick.

It has been the same through the centuries.

Get used to it.

It may be frustrating, but if you're looking for a faithful wife, I'd suggest you find the exact opposite of the typical gal previously described!

2007-10-08 07:41:38 · answer #1 · answered by Avsky 3 · 2 2

That you're an idiot. There is no difference. Maybe there's a reason you're having so much trouble having sex.

The double standard is not about degrees of difficulty, anyway. It goes back to a time before birth control and Maury Povich, when it was impossible for a man to really know if those kids were his. Since all property passed through the male line, society made it a huge bad for women to have sex with anyone but their husbands. A woman who had affairs or who wasn't a virgin could be bearing someone else's kids, which meant her husband was wasting his resources on someone else's DNA. Since it takes awhile for cultural attitudes to change, we're still dealing with this nonsense, even though we now have accurate DNA tests and women who own their own property.

Other societies did other things to deal with this problem. For instance, matrilineal descent is popular. Property ownership or social status or both is obtained through the mother's line. Another way is by having the woman's brother responsible for her children. The kids are definitely related to him, although in a lesser way than if they were his own. In these kinds of societies, the attitudes towards women and their sexuality are remarkably different, which is hardly surprising.

2007-10-08 08:09:56 · answer #2 · answered by random6x7 6 · 3 1

I think that sex should not be a main priority for anyone, but since you are a guy and apparently don't understand the girls perspective, let me explain. A girl isn't looking to get laid when she goes out.... No matter how sexy or provocative she dresses. YES.... there are some woman that do dress just to get laid, but alot of them aren't. We are just trying to have a good time, and though we want your attention, it isn't necessarily because we want to get laid. YOUR WHOLE PURPOSE AS A MAN GOING OUT is to get laid, and women have enough sense to put other things before that. That's why it isn't hard for us to get laid, because we don't CONSTANTLY think about it 24/7. Men can be pathetic in this sense, and I feel kind of sorry for you guys, but hey, if women can abstain from wanting to have sex with everything in sight, literally force ourselves, then we at least look for a man who can do the same. Try an UN-Desperate approach. This may help you out.... but don't take my word for it, I'm just a chick.

2007-10-08 07:26:36 · answer #3 · answered by Tracey 4 · 1 1

Well, I realise it. In fact, it takes two to raise a child. A mother and a father, preferably. But few people can raise a child while at the same time earning a living. Which is why there is a need for feminism. Women support women. As you say, men don't need to care for a baby.

2016-05-19 00:34:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Do you wanna have sex or something??? And you're right the average man cant get "laid" per say as easy as a girl can, but most women look for personality than looks, looks help but they dont go as far as your personality... You sound like a nice guy, so I dont see what the issue is. I realize that it is hard for men to get "it" becasue women have this high standard of men, and they dont want drama just as much as you dont. It's weird, I could go on for hours about this, condradicting myself over and over again, it's a loosing battle

2007-10-08 07:24:58 · answer #5 · answered by lissa082182 3 · 0 1

I think you're saying it's okay to call a woman who sleeps around a whore assuming she looks even moderately good because it's easier to get laid. Where as a man who sleeps around should be looked up to because all men have to work harder to get some.

Yeah, it's still a bloody double standard whether or not you want to claim it's easier for a woman to have sex than a man.

2007-10-08 07:48:51 · answer #6 · answered by Manny 4 · 3 1

Why on earth would it matter how hard or easy it is? If a man and woman both have the exact number of partners in a period of time (lets say each has 15 in a year), it would be considered cool for the man and slutty for the woman... I don't understand what the degree of difficulty has to do with the label.

2007-10-08 07:24:18 · answer #7 · answered by ۞ Vixen ۞ 5 · 4 1

Im a guy and you couldnt have put it better. Any girl who has at least one thing going for her (***,chest,face) can go to a club or bar and go home with a guy. A normal guy who is decent looking has to work hard to get laid, even guys who are really good looking find it hard because they have to have "game". That is the main difference, "game". Skills to pick up somebody. A girl can be as dull as a rock and still get guys, where as guys who are super hott and have no game cant get one. So girls should never ever say its the same thing, cause it is not!

2007-10-08 07:25:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Most women and men prefer quality versus quantity, so I think your premise is misplaced. There's no correlation between how many people one can sleep with and how easily one can bed down someone.

It can be difficult for women to get a man to have sex with them, too.

2007-10-08 08:03:57 · answer #9 · answered by Rainbow 6 · 3 1

You've got a point with your statement. But you are missing the point of your own question.

There is no correlation between what a person is called for having promiscuous sex and how difficult it is to have sex. They are two different comparisons.

2007-10-08 07:23:58 · answer #10 · answered by artistagent116 7 · 6 1

fedest.com, questions and answers