No, you should be outraged at the "rich". They are out there buying yachts and mansions with their money, not paying for your bills. All rich people are evil for spending their money on what they want, not what you want. Spending your money on yourself is only OK if you are poor. We should all hate the rich and not try to become rich.
2007-10-08 06:33:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Aegis of Freedom 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
You raise the philosophic idea
That, as a drunk, can you vote for the sober
To look after your needs, (including a beer)?
Yet you condemn all of them from your sofa
You may be wise and so kind
While you're out of your mind
That you wish for no tax on the poor
But the voters volition ensures a position
Where the middle class vote for a toper
My best formed advice is to stay charming and nice
And to cut down the size of the State
For the world of real work is no stranger to vice
Reward rentiers, not inebriates.
2007-10-08 17:33:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I had to pay for my own gas the other day. Somebody should pay for that! Then I went to the grocery store and had to pay for my own groceries. Everyone deserves to eat, so I don't see why the government doesn't pay for my groceries. Then I got a headache and had to pay for my own Tylenol. Nobody should live in pain, so the government should pay for pain relievers. Shouldn't my taxes cover that stuff?
Libs are funny! I'm curious at what point Libs will actually say, "Okay, that's enough. The government does not need to pay for anything else. Taxes are just fine the way they are."
2007-10-08 13:29:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Brad the Fox 3
·
6⤊
2⤋
THIS IS GREAT IRONY.YOU ARE ANTICIPATING THE SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT OF A CLINTON OR ANY DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT.
2007-10-09 12:54:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why don't you just play in traffic on those government built roads, little boy?
2007-10-08 13:53:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Chew on this speech delivered in 1982 by South Carolina Democrat Senator Fritz Hollings.
A veteran came back from the Korean War and went to college on the GI Bill; bought his house with an FHA loan; saw his kids born in a VA hospital; started a hardware business with SBA loans and advice; got his electricity from TVA and, later, his water from an EPA project. His parents retired to a farm on Social Security, a farm on which they got their electricity from REA and their soil testing through USDA. When his father became very ill, the family was saved from financial disaster by Medicare and a life was saved with a drug developed through NIH research. His kids participated in the school lunch program, learned physics and math in high school from teachers retrained in an NSF program, and were able to go to college through the guaranteed student loans. He drove his car to work every day on the Interstate and moored his boat in a channel dredged by the Army corps of engineers. When floods hit his town a couple of years back, he took Amtrak up to Washington to apply for disaster relief, and, awaiting his meeting, he spent part of his day visiting the Smithsonian Museum and the Washington Monument.
And then -- after all that was said and done -- he sat down one day and wrote his Congressman an angry letter asking the federal government to get off his back, and he complained about paying taxes for all those programs created for ungrateful people who were getting a free ride.
2007-10-08 13:27:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
4⤋
Nice Mark D. Now go back and try to estimate how inefficiently each of those services are provided when compared to the private sector. Thanks for playing.
2007-10-08 13:34:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
FOFL, this has to be tongue in cheek or your for Hillery Rotten Clinton. Peace
2007-10-08 13:34:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by PARVFAN 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
If you need more money, go get a better job.
2007-10-08 13:26:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
2⤋