English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's a given that it can't be done now for obvious reasons, but I must say, Iran has a point. Who are we to say get rid of your Nuclear bomb program with our 10,000 (or more?) Nuc's ****** and loaded to fire at the drop of a hat.
"you might say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one". You'd better believe John Lennon would be in favor of that

2007-10-08 05:04:16 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

A (carefully chosen and monitord)monitoring agency could be set up to...Monitor...the world for WMD's with the power to virtually cripple non-compliance through peacfull means. No partisian politics allowed.
WMD's as deterrants...?Like the death penalty as a deterrant. It dosent stop murder, it just rids the earth of murderers, and innocent murderers. It did'nt stop OJ.

2007-10-08 06:09:24 · update #1

7 answers

As long as US have nukes they have no case to preach to other countries.

2007-10-08 05:08:10 · answer #1 · answered by RX 5 · 2 0

We really are hypocritical over this. During the Cold War the CIA and the military were well aware that we had far more nuclear weapons than the Soviets had, yet they spread fear and terror throughout our country and lied about how much of a threat the USSR was in order to maintain the outsized millitary budget. They are still doing the same thing today, because it works. We are a nation of suckers.

2007-10-08 05:15:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That's an admirable goal, but since the dawn of man he has been seeking ways to kill more efficiently. Even if all nuclear weapons were scraped tomorrow, the knowledge needed to produce these weapons is still there.

2007-10-08 05:14:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

all we are saying: "is give peace a chance"

eradicate away. Conventional warfare does plenty of damage. Nukes are NEVER necessary.

2007-10-08 05:09:26 · answer #4 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 3 0

Any real enemy of the US would not be stupid enough to send missiles, there are better and smarter ways

Ban the Bomb!

2007-10-08 05:14:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If guns are outlawed only outlaws will have then>add WMD instead of guns>>When that do you use as a super power as a deterrent> Please don't use them on us>>>Liberal logic>

2007-10-08 05:11:56 · answer #6 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 0 3

I say bye bye nukes. I don't think that they are necessary.

2007-10-08 05:11:21 · answer #7 · answered by Lisa M 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers