I'm working on a law case in Legal Systems, a class at my school, and one of the opposing counsels witnesses (an expert medical examiner) testifies that because of the fracture on the victims interior side of his left leg, she concludes that he must have been hit (by the car) directly there. But I'm trying to prove that if he was hit directly there, the injury would have been much worse than a simple tibia fracture, because the tibia is weak. I want to prove that he was running across the street and the car hit him on the outside of his left leg, but it still resulted in a tibia fracture on the inside. Is this possible?
2007-10-08
04:54:54
·
2 answers
·
asked by
NayNay
2
in
Health
➔ General Health Care
➔ Injuries