Hillary was asked a tough question by a voter , of which she didn't want to answer . So in her typical elitist style , she employed her favorite misdirectional comment by saying that the asker must be a 'plant' . Surely no commoner is smart enough to think for themselves and ask real questions .
Now I direct you to the Y/A boards . Just how many times have we conservatives be called 'PLANTS OR PAID SHILLS' ?
The number is exponentionally high so feel free to answer with words like - 'a kazillion'. . . 'loads and loads'. . . 'enough to fill the Grand Canyon'. . . or 'so many times it's galactically impossible to count' .
I really don't think Hillary has Y/A accounts , but doesn't this ring a bell ?
Why is it that the left just doesn't think it's even possible for others to have differing views without being 'PLANTS or PAID SHILLS' ?. . . . .It reeks of ELITISM and will be one of the factors for a Democratic loss in 2008 .
2007-10-08 04:47:07 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Very true. How many times have I read things like "How many of you are drawing paychecks from the RNC?". It's almost like.... If you can't see things our way, you must be on that payroll.
We know that Hillary doesn't waste her time on Y!A, nor does any other politician but that doesn't preclude that each politician doesn't have it's own support base.
As a conservative, I value the right to freedom of speech just like anyone else and plan on using it!
2007-10-08 04:55:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
I'm a Hillary supporter, as you know Earnest, and I've never called anyone on here a plant or a paid shill. Usually you are so calm and reasonable, what's up with this emotionally over the top question? How many times do conservatives in YA call every Democrat cowards, or terrorist lovers, or Godless, or communists or socialists or equally ridiculous labels. I've had the same accusation leveled at me - that I must be a paid shill because I support Sen. Clinton so loudly. It's ridiculous from both sides. I'm surprised at you for falling into that trap.
2007-10-08 05:51:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
How many times has Hillary blamed the deficit on George Bush, knowing full well that the Budgets for 2001 and 2002 were written by her husband?
How many times has Hillary accused George Bush of not providing Armor for the troops when it was her husband who directed military spending away from training and equipment into research and development?
How many people have fallen for these unethical and untruthful accusations, believing them as if they were gospel from the mouth of some pagan god?
Hillary's constant accusations of a "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" are based on her understanding of the voters she associates with, Liberal Democrats.
Since these voters she associates with believe her utterly ridiculous statements the voting public must be, well, as bright as the voters who support her.
Therefore anyone not believing her utterly ridiculous statements must not be part of the voting public, but, a member of the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" out to destroy her!
Can you imagine anyone nutty enough to vote such a paranoid pseudo-intellectual into office?
Only people from a Northern State that nearly joined the Confederacy during the Civil War and who rioted in the streets of the Big Apple lynching blacks on lamp posts could possibly be twisted enough to elect a woman who spouts the same Democratic rhetoric against Bush and Iraq that Democrats spouted against Lincoln and the Civil War.
The actions of Hillary Clinton and her supporters only tell us who, between Liberals and Independents, the more educated voters are.
PS: exponential
Main Entry:
ex·po·nen·tial Listen to the pronunciation of exponential
Function:
adjective
1: of or relating to an exponent2: involving a variable in an exponent <10x is an exponential expression>3: expressible or approximately expressible by an exponential function; especially : characterized by or being an extremely rapid increase (as in size or extent)
"The number is exponentionally (sic) high" or "The number is so GROWING SO RAPIDLY high"
While I like "astronomically high" better than "exponentially high", I cannot fault the usage of the term "exponentially high".
2007-10-08 05:09:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
ABCNews interviewed the Campaign Manager for Hillary '08. Patty Solis-Doyle. A trusted friend and associate? for over 16 yrs I believe she said. She has a staff of over 400. You can be sure some are paid to monitor websites as large as Y! Answers. My Space and AOL. If they contribute I would be surprised. But, nothing about them is off limits. Thanks.
2007-10-08 05:01:15 · answer #4 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Plants at Republican town hall meetings are okay but to do it to a democrat especially Saint Hillary is a crime, don't you know free speech only works if you are a liberal. That is why they want to crack down on Talk Radio while the Daily Kos and Moveon.org spread lie after lie.
2007-10-08 12:22:16 · answer #5 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If I see a question or answer that seems to element alongside the unusual traces i think of, I inspect the profile. If i admire what I see, I upload them. I constantly seem and that i'm very picky.
2016-10-21 11:07:17 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HillBillary is of the opinion that answering any question that actually reveals her true nature and agenda is beneath her. She can't afford to take even one measly position of substance on any particular issue lest she offends George Soros or his minions.
2007-10-08 09:05:44 · answer #7 · answered by Salsa Shark 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
With the defeat of the Shamnesty bill sellout>There soft ball no answer questions>wait till she has to answer the Rep Q= then you will see an implosion>Of laughter & screams> There dosen't have to be any plants there there own worst enemy>
2007-10-08 04:57:00 · answer #8 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure if Hillary's thought of this, so has every other candidate. I DO wish there was some way to weed this sort of stuff out though.
2007-10-08 05:09:56 · answer #9 · answered by Roland'sMommy 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Keep in mind the left is the narcissist or "people of the lie".
And they have three weapons and truth and open ideas are not part of them.
They are try to befriend.
Then attack or project them self upon you.
Then to be the victim.
They have three plays which are so easy to read even before they play them.
And yes they can say and project their lies all they want as I welcome them with gusto.
2007-10-08 07:26:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋