I mean he shook Tomlin's hand and looked the exact opposite way. Does he just have something against the Steelers, or what?
2007-10-08 04:06:27 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I don't think either team played to their potential yesterday. It was just an OK game IMO.
2007-10-08 04:13:47 · update #1
I think the Seahags did play to their potential & that's why Holmgren was so upset. 144 yds. total offense & 19 min. time of possession. I guess he & the Seaducks actually believed their headlines that said they were an explosive offensive team & were going to extract revenge for SBXL. Well, they certainly showed the country who was the better team. It must have hurt his ego big time to get completely outcoached by a rookie coach in his 5th NFL game!
2007-10-08 14:13:44 · answer #1 · answered by Toe Cutter 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is a racist, and he just proved it. He, and his team got beat all over the field by the Steelers yesterday. Holmgrem can not stand that he lost to them again, and he does not like black people.
2007-10-08 12:08:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He's probably embarassed that they keep getting smacked around by the Steelers.
2007-10-08 11:29:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps it was as simple as because the Seahawks lost and played so badly. Pulling out that race card sure was BS. Idiot!
2007-10-08 12:57:53 · answer #4 · answered by Johanna 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Holmgrim was just pre-occupied trying to think of an excuse for this butt-whippin.
2007-10-08 12:16:02 · answer #5 · answered by stan l 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sometimes its tough to look your opponent in the eye especially after a whoopin. seattle didnt show up to play sunday and it showed throughout.
2007-10-08 11:11:05 · answer #6 · answered by rooster_nugget 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Can anyone say SUPER BOWL XL!
2007-10-08 11:42:34 · answer #7 · answered by SMARTY 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
maybe he dislikes the guy.
could be personsal
2007-10-08 11:23:57 · answer #8 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't see it so I can't say.
2007-10-08 11:11:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋