English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

That is pretty easy. They are opposites of each other.

2007-10-08 07:34:56 · answer #1 · answered by Deirdre O 7 · 1 2

You use the Roman alphabet to spell both phrases? The word "movement" is used in both? They both involve people? I give up. One is a movement to bring equality and social justice to over half the population and is concerned with the plight of all people regardless of skin color. The other is a foul, racist movement whose members are primarily sad, stupid men with very low self-esteem who feel that they can't compete on an equal footing with nonwhite people. Feminism and the white supremacist movement have pretty much opposite aims here.

2007-10-08 03:54:51 · answer #2 · answered by random6x7 6 · 5 2

well: white supremacists call for forced repatriation, and feminists don't;

white supremacists tend to live out in the woods with lots of guns (or at least want to) and feminists don't;

white supremacists tend to be poorly educated males and feminists don't.

i guess i can see why you find the two movements indistinguishable (especially when i consider #3).

2007-10-08 04:00:23 · answer #3 · answered by synopsis 7 · 3 3

Well sheg heil to ure idere thre. Wes be liken in toughts. Im thet ther presedent of myn chaptar of mi Nasi grup.

2007-10-08 04:32:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

They are both 'movements'?

2007-10-08 17:50:30 · answer #5 · answered by Ashleigh 7 · 0 1

They both claim a target groups is violent. They both claim beeing victim of a target group and therefore call for force against the target group. They both call for segregation, lady space, whites only, they both call for special laws and perks.

2007-10-08 05:02:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

Spurious accusations of rape and promotion of fear about rape would be a good start.

Apparently feminist's idea of eliminating racism is to take the concepts used in hatred of black men and apply them to all men instead.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B Anthony were pretty darned racist if you ask me:

"I would not trust him [the Black man] with all my rights; degraded, oppressed himself, he would be more despotic with the governing power than even our Saxon rulers are" - Susan B Anthony.

"a man's government is worse than a white man's government" because universal manhood suffrage creates an antagonism between "the black man and all women and will culminate in fearful outrages on womanhood, especially in the Southern states" - Susan B Anthony

"Why should we not accept all in favor of woman suffrage to our platform and association even though they be rabid pro-slavery Democrats." - Susan B Anthony

"If women are still to be represented by men, then I say let [it be] only the highest type of man.... But if all men are to vote, black and white, lettered and unlettered, washed and unwashed, the safety of the nation as well as the interests of women demand that we outweigh this incoming tide of poverty, ignorance and vice with the virtue, wealth and education of the woman of this country" - Elizabeth Cady Stanton

2007-10-08 03:54:55 · answer #7 · answered by Brother Happy 2 · 2 9

fedest.com, questions and answers