English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know what a hat-trick in cricket is. However, I want someone to answer this for me (with references if possible). Here is a situation - A bowler takes 2 wickets off the last deliveries of a match. Now, he takes one wicket off the very first delivery of the next match. Is that considered a hat-trick? In this same situation, for the next match, he does not bowl the first delivery but takes a wicket off his first delivery which is the first of the 8th over for example. Has he still taken a hat-trick?

2007-10-08 03:31:57 · 13 answers · asked by ajitpardeshi 3 in Sports Cricket

13 answers

Your example is quite correct.
Hat-trick does not mean that three wickets in over only.
Even it is not a Hat-trick if the bowler takes three wickets in over not in a row.
................................v

2007-10-12 02:37:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No. For a hat-trick the bowler has to take 3 wickets in consecutive balls in the same match.

2007-10-08 19:36:55 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

Yes that will be considered as a hat-trick but this will be popularly known as a "SPLIT HAT-TRICK" there have been many occasions where such hat-trick's have been taken as mentioned.

By the way Shreesanth is on a split hat-trick as he had taken 2 wickets of the last 2 balls of the last match and did not play the next matches :):):)

2007-10-12 01:33:50 · answer #3 · answered by ajay y 2 · 1 0

definetly Yes, it will be considered as a hat-trick.
hat-trick means taking three wickets conscutively regardless of match...

It has happened in a test match between West Indies & Australia where Jeromene Lawson completed a hat-trick in the second innings.

Walsh & Hughes have also done it

2007-10-08 04:29:46 · answer #4 · answered by abha 3 · 1 0

yes that will be considered as a hat trick doesnt matter if he bowls the last over of the next match but it must be his first bowl of the next match. and he must have taken 2 wickets of his last two balls of his last match to conclude this as a hat trick

2007-10-08 04:31:47 · answer #5 · answered by Khawja Shams 2 · 0 0

Yes, it will be considered as a hat-trick.

It has happened in a test match between West Indies & Australia where Jeromene Lawson completed a hat-trick in the second innings.

Walsh & Hughes have also done it

2007-10-08 03:56:26 · answer #6 · answered by The Great Montitude 7 · 2 0

If a bowler takes 3 wickets continuously.It is known as hat-trick.

2007-10-08 03:36:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Will ONLY be a hatric if a bowler takes 3wickets in 3consecutive balls that he bowled.. Even if he takes da last wicket in da 1st innings n comes on to bowl da 69th over of the second innings, if he takes 2 wickets in da first two balls he bowls den, he has a hatric.. A bowler CANNOT get a hatric over 2games

2007-10-08 05:47:03 · answer #8 · answered by PROTEA 5 · 0 0

Yes, since he has taken three wickets off three consecutive deliveries

2007-10-12 02:46:15 · answer #9 · answered by rak 1 · 0 0

it is considered as a hat-trick in a test match but not in one day internationals.

2007-10-08 08:18:20 · answer #10 · answered by ravi k 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers