English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-08 03:09:31 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

It obviously depends on what one wishes to choose to do........

2007-10-08 03:13:06 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 0 0

You're right. Without any regulations, it would be easier for people to take out Hillary before she becomes president.

2007-10-08 10:23:24 · answer #2 · answered by Fred Head 4 · 0 0

No, by all means, lets head back to the days of no seat belts, unregulated "medicine" for the sick and infirmed, sweat shops in NYC that employ 11 year olds, and other great ideas when government was less proactive! Sarcasm.

2007-10-08 10:14:49 · answer #3 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 2 1

Depends on the choice.

2007-10-08 10:12:31 · answer #4 · answered by TJTB 7 · 1 0

I agree with Jacob. Your question is far too general. It smells like you've got a hidden agenda.

2007-10-08 10:38:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Absolutely NOT

2007-10-08 10:27:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sorry, too general.

.

2007-10-08 10:14:13 · answer #7 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 2 0

no. that would not be a good thing.

2007-10-08 10:26:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers