2007-10-08 02:58:31 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yeah they esestinaly want the population to think its either gonna be obama or clinton.... if i didnt know any better id think they were the only 2 canidates.... just remember how biased the media truly is.
2007-10-08 03:02:47 · answer #1 · answered by chris 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are just trying to convince the public that democrats are better choice. That is why you never hear about casualties are down in Iraq but you always hear about casualties are high. That is why you always hear about republicans being caught in scandals but never hear about republicans doing good for their communities and where they live in. As with democrats you only hear about the good they do but you never hear about all the bad they do. Remember when Larry Craig's bathroom "sex sting" with no evidence spoken or signaled he was looking for sex just happened to come out when Hillary and Obama were accepting rich donations from that poor criminal Hsu. Luckily the Larry Craig sting did not last as long as most do and within a week Hsu was back in the news. But still nothing happened. Now if that had been a republican the democrats would be screaming for resignations and saying the whole republican party is bad for doing this instead of the individuals.
And people say nothing is biased.
2007-10-08 03:08:15 · answer #2 · answered by Fallen 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If the media is rooting for hillary.. Then trying to convince people of her inevitable presidency would be the perfect tactic.
2007-10-08 03:02:49 · answer #3 · answered by jondaily 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it ought to no longer be as obtrusive to you yet as that's to many others, however the media is monopolized via in common terms 5 substantial firms. There unquestionably is a unmarried candidate that proposes reliable reform, return to constitutional rules and speaks truthfully. His call is Ron Paul. The media forget approximately him because of the fact he's achievable to the 4 substantial banking concerns that administration the worldwide's funds. in case you will possibly go with to earnings greater, watch the action picture "Zeitgeist." you will get Zeitgeist for unfastened via looking Google video clips. that's a watch opener! when you spot it, you will comprehend why the media pushes some applicants and ignores others. quite. do only it. visit Google video precise now and get carry of the action picture for unfastened. tell others. that's significant on your freedom and the way forward for mankind. i'm no longer exaggerating.
2016-12-14 11:03:45 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is absolutely rediculous to say that anything is inevitable at this point... we are more than a year out! Honestly this election started way too early... by the time it finally rolls around people are going to be completely jaded.
2007-10-08 03:02:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well... the media (at least where I live and have access to) elected Bush over Kerry in the last election...
2007-10-08 03:02:10 · answer #6 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, but the beleaguered Democratic party is.
2007-10-08 03:03:27 · answer #7 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely yes. The MSM propaganda machine is in full ahead mode.
I wonder why they don't cover NAU?
2007-10-08 03:04:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The media isn't trying to convince you of anything. They want you to CONSUME, CONSUME, CONSUME.
2007-10-08 03:30:53 · answer #9 · answered by LatexSolarBeef 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's obvious isn't it? They say she is ahead in the polls, yet I know of no one who is going to vote for her. lol
2007-10-08 03:09:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋