2007-10-08 01:19:28 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/06/findlaw.analysis.dean.wmd/
2007-10-08 01:27:10 · update #1
My overiding concern is that the constitution is upheld, many of you have brought up valid points, that indeed congress is remiss in, however their MOST SOLEMN duty is to uphold the constitution. This issue alone is what made me become an Independent.
2007-10-08 01:52:39 · update #2
Yes.
bush and cheney should have been impeached after they were both found to be asleep at the wheel on 9-11-01.
As far as I'm concerned, I love my country, as it used to be, but under this un-elected radical, named bush, I am very very ashamed.
Congress should be taking care of business and cutting the cancer out before it spreads to the entire nation, and all Democracy will be lost.
.
2007-10-08 01:49:24 · answer #1 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Mr Bush's term of office will expire in about a year anyhow. IMO it would be foolish of Congress to expend our public treasure AND create a media circus (I lived through Watergate, did you?) to accomplish something that is going to happen all by itself by doing nothing. Mr Cheney, on the other hand, should persued and held personally accountable for restitution of all the funds he has cost our public treasury through his funnelling public monies away from what should have been public works projects performs by government employees (either civilian or military) and toward lucrative contracts for private contractors. Back in the old days when the Army peeled its own potatoes, it created jobs and a stable, supervised environment that was perfect for many of those people who are now unemployable by the private sector and therefore homeless.
2007-10-08 02:06:02 · answer #2 · answered by kill_yr_television 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Waste of time and money because:
1. He has done nothing to be impeached. WMDs in Iraq story is rooted in Clinton Presidency. Hours of video evidence.
2. Even if impeached he would not leave office (as Clinton should have) anyway so what's the point.
3. Distract his and congress's attention from the war.
4. Cost billion of dollars in tax money.
2007-10-08 01:30:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
No congress isn't doing their job. Instead of worrying about impeaching Bush, how about impeaching themselves and allow us to start over?
Congress is a joke anymore. How many times has the anti-war resolution failed again? How many times are they going to try to shove illegal immigration down our throats? Spending on both sides is out of control. Don't even get me started.......
2007-10-08 01:35:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Yes, but you have to remember, almost every republican tried to prevent them from having Gonzo resign, even when there was proof of wrong doing, so it would be next to impossible for them to get Bush impeached. it would be a waste of time even trying.
Bush and Cheney, both should be bounced out of office and booted straight out of the country, tar and feathered on their way out for violating the supreme court decision, United States vs Nixon, if nothing else.
but i am beginning to think that Republicans these days support BIG GOVERNMENT and police states.
2007-10-08 02:06:29 · answer #5 · answered by Boss H 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Impeachment without a crime? seems pretty ridiculous to me, that would be like saying "Let's impeach Hillary before she is elected", the only difference is that with her campaign contributions and such there just might be a real crime here.
2007-10-08 02:24:38 · answer #6 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No I don't. Even Congress needs PROOF, not just allegations, because they don't (Liberals) like an elected official, before attempting to impeach. You see, Congress doesn't have any proof, and neither do you.
What Congress is failing on, is stopping illegals from crossing our border.
2007-10-08 01:45:34 · answer #7 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Well, if you buy into the H.C. [Hitlery Con] you will see a virtual end to your rights because she is all about Socialistic programs which in and of itself is UN-constitutional!
+
2007-10-08 02:09:47 · answer #8 · answered by km 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but not for the Iraq War. But for not securing and protecting our boarders. That and infrastructure are the 2 most important functions of the gov't. Bush has failed miserably by allowing all these illegals and terrorists to infiltrate our country.
2007-10-08 01:56:39 · answer #9 · answered by Fred Head 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Congress is not doing it's duty by wasting time trying to grab power and not representing the people. President Bush has not committed any crimes there-fore no reason to impeach.
2007-10-08 01:37:20 · answer #10 · answered by hdean45 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋