To those of you with firm opinions........if an outcome to these two tragic events eventually comes to light, but that varies with your theories - is there any way that you would ever be able to accept that you were wrong?
2007-10-07 21:22:19 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Fascinating answers so far.
2007-10-07 22:17:32 · update #1
Nope.I would just say the jury were wrong.....Only joking.
Yes of course.I would not apologise for believing in innocent until proven guilty but,I would say a big sorry to everyone I have argued with about the issue.
Great question.
2007-10-07 21:35:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Of course!! But the difficulty is that it's not always possible to prove a negative. For example, there have already been thorough enquiries into the Dodi/Diana accident which have shown, insofar as it's possible to do so, that it was nothing more nor less than that - an accident. But that didn't stop Mohammed Fayed continuing to put forward conspiracy theories even though the simplest analysis would show that "arranging" a car crash could not guarantee the death of the occupants of the car (especially the heavily armoured vehicle they were in) and that if anyone had designs on Dodi and Diana their deaths could have been brought about much more easily by other means and with far more assurance of success. What is to say that if the findings of the current inquest don't produce a guilty party other than a drunk driver, Fayed won't trot out even more implausible accusations about Prince Charles & the Duke of Edinburgh and there will undoubtedly be the anti-Royalists and those for whom Diana could do no wrong who will continue to support him.
As far as the McCanns are concerned, their evasiveness will ensure that they will never be brought to trial despite their suspect status because there just won't be sufficient evidence to secure a conviction. However their actions since the disappearance of Madeleine will almost guarantee that the finger of suspicion will follow them around for ever because without a trial they can't be found not guilty.
2007-10-08 00:29:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
These two cases are very different.
Dodi/Diana - were driven to their deaths by a driver who had been drinking, speeding, and clipped the kerb. That is called an accident.
McCanns - there is currently no proof released into the public domain for them being innocent or guilty but as police have collected evidence for months and are still researching the McCanns then there must be some indication that they MAY (AND HERE I SAY MAY!) have some involvement.
2007-10-07 21:51:32 · answer #3 · answered by Saucy B 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yeah of course,but if i thought they were still covering something up or if they hadnt called the relevent witnesses then i would not be convinced.
The same goes for the mcCanns,but i would be really surprised if they had anything to do with Madeleines disappearence(yes i know they left her,but you know what i mean)
2007-10-07 23:10:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you give your opinion about something no mater what, you have to put the option that you can be wrong, but I support my ideas with facts from professionals even if they're 100% sometimes you just need 75% to have your opinion to go on that direction.
Very good question, star.
2007-10-07 22:50:18 · answer #5 · answered by Tim 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I take nothing to do with Di and Dodi.
As far as the McCanns are concerned I would love to be proven wrong and for that little girl to turn up soon but the neglect issue was my first problem with the pair and it always will be.
2007-10-07 21:27:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
YES, i won't make up an excuse like E.G if the McCanns are found guilty i will except and not say "they were set up by the Portuguese police"
2007-10-07 21:26:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
It would be sad for me to come to terms that parents could actually kill & hide evidence of the murder of their own precious baby daughter & that too while on a happy holiday, but the TRUTH is what matters...not the debate.
I'd be shocked & sad but, of course, i'd accept that i was wrong.
But guess what???!
Its not going to happen.
The McCanns never did murder their Madeleine.
2007-10-07 22:09:55 · answer #8 · answered by Faith 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes I agree with you. If we are proven wrong then we are wrong and we have to accept it, but both seen to be dragging on and on. It's hard to know if the truth will ever come out. §
2007-10-07 23:14:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course. But the consipracy theorists are absolutely right. You know a fishy feeling in your guts that something isn';t quite right. If it turns out that I am wrong, I am perfectly willing to accept that my fishy guts were too!
2007-10-07 21:27:24 · answer #10 · answered by Miss Behavin 5 · 7⤊ 0⤋