Could care less. Dems are almost as guilty in receiving funny money.
What I wonder, is why so many call China red when it is arguably the most capitalistic system on the earth. Communism and Capitalism are polar opposites. Even Henry Kissinger, the cold warriors warrior agrees to that.
Time to get a few lessons on "Red" China. Read below.
===================
1 They are not communist country which is the polar opposite of capitalism, which they are. They are communist in name only.
2 They have given their people more freedom in the last few decades then ever before in their 5,000 year history.
3 They are actively correcting the problems with bad and dangerous products.
4. They are actively correcting the problems with their pollution which they have said is terrible.
5. They are reforming their judicial system
6. They are slowly morphing into a democratic republic at their own pace, not the pace the west wants.
7. They are not likely to repeat their mistakes. They are too old and wise for that.
8. They are an extremely positive.
9. They believe in a countries right to self determination and has made a pledge to the Chinese people they will not invade a sovereign country. The USA has made no such pledge in both regards. They believe in diplomatic solutions rather then negativism and threats.
10. Unlike the USA, they plan for the future through a series of one and five year plans. That has proven to be a success because in the last 20 years they went from an economic joke to world class to very likely the most powerful economy in the future.
Peace
Jim
.
2007-10-07 17:13:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
I must not have read the same article as you, because your link does show illegal fundraising by George W. or his family. They has legal business dealings with Chinese companies. Last time I knew this was considered perfectly legal.
Also, The Nation is not a reliable source of unbiased news.
2007-10-07 17:23:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by A Human Bean 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Did you read the article?
As twisted as their political position is, they stopped short of saying that Bush took any cash.
IT DOESN'T SAY BUSH TOOK CASH!!!
This is just an attempt to get the left off the hook for whoring themselves to China.
2007-10-07 17:14:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
tell me is there some thing incorrect with a president vacationing a foriegn usa? if so thats been happening for a protracted time and that i don't remember Bush or any member of his government paying for and merchandising US missile training tech to the chinese language for a campaign contribution like the Clintons did.
2016-10-06 07:13:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by courcelle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush Clinton two sides of the same coin as far as this sort of thing is concerned. Sr. and Bill get along great Jr. sends secret messages to Hillary.
2007-10-07 17:14:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Interesting article. The Democrats accuse the Republicans of taking money from the Chinese and the Republicans accuse the Democrats of taking money from them. So who do you think will go to jail? Wait, wait, don't tell me...No One!!!
2007-10-07 17:13:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
"The Nation" now there's an unbiased source, not. I must have read something different than your question states. It does not say they took cash.
2007-10-07 17:21:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by ohbrother 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, and I won't. We do not get good people because the good ones will not take money from those whom they do not approve of. Peace
2007-10-07 17:16:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by PARVFAN 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have you read the modicum of articles on how the Clinton gang took money from Saudi princes -- to say nothing of the donors who either fled the country or ended up dead?
2007-10-07 17:11:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Richard S 5
·
3⤊
4⤋
Have you read the answer on what the Clinton's are responsible for?
Under Clinton we had :
Kidnappings of U.S. Citizens in Colombia, January 31, 1993:
World Trade Center Bombing, February 26, 1993:
Attempted Assassination of President Bush by Iraqi Agents, April 14, 1993:
Attack on U.S. Diplomats in Pakistan, March 8, 1995:
Bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City, April 19, 1995:
Attack on U.S. Embassy in Moscow, September 13, 1995:
Khobar Towers Bombing, June 25, 1996: A fuel truck carrying a bomb exploded outside the US military's Khobar Towers housing facility in Dhahran, killing 19 U.S. military personnel and wounding 515 persons, including 240 U.S. personnel. Several groups claimed responsibility for the attack.
Empire State Building Sniper Attack, February 23, 1997:
U.S. Embassy Bombings in East Africa, August 7, 1998:
USS Cole
And the list goes on and on
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-10-07 17:13:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋