How can (mindless NeoCon deity) George Bush...?

Question

...justify asking the Congress for another 50 BILLION for another war of pointless deaths and tragedy in Iraq, while stubbornly veto-ing a financially modest bill that would provide the nations lower class and lower-middle class children with MUCH NEEDED health insurance ? And don't answer with that crap about "I pay for mine", or "the market should take care of it". That's nothing but denial and passing of the buck...

The market IS NOT taking care of it. Simple health care is financially out of reach of ALOT of HARD WORKING Americans.

What on Earth could possibly justify Bush's rationale ?

make that "another year of war". Sorry bout that.

G-man : translation "I choose to cower and duck this question". Thanks for submitting your surrender on this issue.

ParvFan : I see you are another coward. Quibbling over symantics. Nice ducking of my question. ROFL ! You Cons are too easy.

Mike : You may want to consider medication. You're clinically paranoid.

This is great Daniel L claims the $ limit is 80K, witwwats says 60K.

I love how you cons can't even get your talking points straight...You may want to consider NOT quibbling over this and that, and just acknowledge that this bill would provide healthcare to alot of needy children. Or would you rather bicker about income levels more ? ROFL !!

Answer 1

I have no idea why bush doesn't want healthy American kids for his wars.

Answer 2

i'm optimistic George Washington does not such as you or lots of the persons working the rustic now. as a rely of actuality if Washington have been President precise now countless contributors of the click would nave already been complete for publishing categorized state secrets and techniques. to not point out particularly some congress people of the two properties, events and sexes would have been dealt with. formerly you ask what some one would do in a difficulty it would help to appreciate greater approximately them than grew to become into written in a 5th grade history e book. the Founding Fathers of this usa have been some severe adult males and does not have positioned up with the habit exhibited by skill of a great number of congress and for that rely your hero's like Sean Penn and Michel Moore would have chanced on our actual rapid what's meant to take place to those whom deal in sedition and treasonous habit.

Answer 3

Well, maybe because the bill didn't just cover children but extended "free," taxpayer healthcare to 23-year-olds. In most countries, including the US, 23-year-olds are considered adults. Maybe because it extended "free," taxpayer healthcare to the kids of parents who make up to $80,000 a year. Now, that ain't rich these days, but it sure as hell ain't poor. If they want their kids to have healthcare, let them struggle to pay the premiums like my family does. Maybe because this "free," taxpayer healthcare was really another step toward government healthcare but through the back door. Britain, Canada, Mexico all have government healthcare and it doesn't work. But when have facts and evidence ever stopped the Democrats from doing what they want to do? Why couldn't the Democrats stand up and admit that's what they were doing instead of the lies? Do they think so country is that stupid that we couldn't figure out what they were doing?

They knew our President would veto it; he's been saying it for months, but they sent it anyway so that people ill-informed and full of hatred people like yourself would use the guise of "poor sick children" to blame the President for something else, as if you need a reason. The President says and has been saying that he's willing to compromise but the Democrats have refused to compromise, y'know "Their way or no way."

"I pay for mine" isn't crap, Sweetheart, it's reality. I'd gladly help out kids who need it, and have, incidentally, but not for adults under the work "children" and not for people who want somebody else to take on their responsibilities.

Answer 4

Because, the bill Bush vetoed included families making up to 80k a year, at that income bracket the jobs those families have would provide reasonably priced health care. And the bill also included illegal aliens. Why should American tax dollars go to paying the health costs of people who don't pay taxes. Simple enuff to understand why this bill was vetoed. IT was designed to benefit people who didn't need it or deserve it.

Answer 5

Nothing can justify it. Bush thinks he is above all others. He's not. You know, if Congress does not overrdie Bush's veto, I do lose my healthcare insurance. I am a type 1 diabetic. I need my insulin and medications. Do you know how much it would cost me per month if I had no insurance?

$732.47

That's a lot of money. My parents work. I work. I still can't afford that. I need that medication for the rest of my life. I need CHIP to stay alive. Bush is vetoing my life. Bring our troops home. Save the lives of our soliders, and our children.

Answer 6

If a Democrat is elected as Commander-in-Chief you had better hope you have health care. If they allow Iraq to collapse and allow Iran to develop nukes you are sure going to need it.

.

Answer 7

You obviously weren't in the room when this was decided.

Bush vetoed the bill because it included healthcare for people earning over $60,000 per year.

The problem here is that you have no idea what you are talking about and just wish to bash the president.

Hopefully you don't vote or breed.

Answer 8

I think that now that the corporations have all the cheap labor they want in China, India, etc., the government just wants the poor to die off.

Answer 9

would you rather fight the terrorists on the streets of Baghdad, or when they come for you marching down Main Street, USA ? You Liberal whiners won't stop till they are in control, and if GOD FORBID that happens, who will you blame, but yourself?

Answer 10

You have know idea what a NeoCon is because Bush isn't one. Peace