English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't think Liberals really care about a Soldiers life. I think death of anything that says Republican is their dream. If I am wrong, explain the why, and the how, please. My experience on this forum, watching News, and life, say this is TRUE. I think Libs have a lot of explaining to do! Here is your format. Go ahead?

2007-10-07 16:29:35 · 27 answers · asked by xenypoo 7 in Politics & Government Politics

allure said old and tired....Gosh that baby didn't get a chance to get old and tired did he/she? You did. EXPLAIN that!

2007-10-07 16:41:19 · update #1

Boss....show me the REASON in the DEATH of a "soon to be baby", and the death of a SOLDIER who protects you hinny!??? You make sense!

2007-10-07 16:44:36 · update #2

27 answers

Don't expect logical liberal responses...not gonna happen!

2007-10-07 16:33:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8 6

I agree with you to a degree, but you made the rather heinous logical error of forging a connection between two things which really aren't connected. I would like to say this about the nitwits who say they support the troops but not the mission: that's just stupid. Especially when we're talking about Iraq: if you don't support finishing this thing, some creepy nutjobs will come in and take over the fledgling government, making all our effort over the past four and a half years a complete waste of time. Not only that, but ten years down the road, we wouldn't have a choice but to send them back over to fix an even bigger mess, which would end up killing more of our own men. With something big like helping to create a new ally, you can't think only about the consequences, say, three months from now. You have to anticipate problems a few years down the road, which in a situation like this isn't hard to do; focusing only on what's happening right now is one of the stupidest and most destructive things one can do.

2007-10-07 16:51:28 · answer #2 · answered by Richard S 5 · 0 2

You`re correct ; a soldier was once a baby .What you are trying to do here is get a liberal to tell you their version of death with and without a choice for the one who is dying ? When is it OK to kill a baby or a soldier , and when it is not OK to kill a baby or a soldier ! Either way a life is either silenced or permitted to live , so the liberals need to explain the scale they go by to determine when is death good , and when is death bad ; and what logic they use to arrive at their decision .....

2007-10-07 17:41:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

And Republicans support the war,capital punishment and some even support killing abortion doctors. People believe what they want to believe so why should anything be explained to any one with a closed,judgmental mindset? What a lot of republicans don't understand is that everyone has a right to their own opinion weather or not it matches their own. God bless America and save it from the narrow minded!

2007-10-07 16:40:45 · answer #4 · answered by info.girl 2 · 2 1

Ball of flesh: hardly
Clump of cells that aren't alive: really?
Week 10 Around 8 Weeks After Conception
Most of the joints are formed now - elbow, wrist, knee, shoulder, and ankle as well as the hands, fingers, feet and toes.
Week 11 Around 9 Weeks After Conception
The most critical part of the baby's development is over. This is a period of rapid growth, and the baby is about an inch or so in length at the beginning of the week and will be about 2 inches by the end of the week. The baby's head is about half its length. The eyelids will fuse shut, and the irises will begin to develop. Sometime during this week or the next week, blood will begin to circulate between the baby and uterus and the placenta starts to function.
Week 12 Around 10 Weeks After Conception
By this point, nearly all of the organs and structures of the fetus are formed. They will continue to grow and develop until delivery. Fingers and toes have separated and hair and nails begin to grow. The genitals begin to take on their gender characteristics. Amniotic fluid begins to accumulate as the baby's kidneys begin to produce and excrete urine. The muscles in the intestinal walls begin to practice peristalsis - contractions within the intestines that digest food.

2007-10-07 16:44:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Hypocrisy. Libs live for the moment and don't give a lot of thought to the future. Except for politics. They have been spewing their vile on the unsuspecting public about the war. War is hell. No doubt about it. But wars take time and libs have manipulated people into believing that this war should have been over in a matter of days, weeks, or a few months. This is not logical. Of course most libs don't have logic but unfortunately neither do millions of independent minded voters...

2007-10-07 16:39:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I think you have a lot of explaining to do. Why are you so willing to paint liberals with the same brush. Don't we get identitites? I don't think abortion is right, I don't think it is moral, i don't beleive in it. I think liberals do care about solider's lives. I sent my brother to war. He stayed and he fought for OUR country. I don't think the death of anything republican is a a liberal dream. I think Bush out of office is a REALISTIC GOAL for liberals. (Counting down the days...) I think you are FALSE, moreover, I think this was not a question, more like a rant that politically biased to suit your needs. Try again later.....

2007-10-07 16:51:58 · answer #7 · answered by Senator D*L*P™ 5 · 0 2

Umm to the person who says that a fetus isn't alive until it exits the womb is a dipsh*t.

Anyway, no Liberals in high office DONT care about a soldiers life....neither do Republicans in high office....soldiers are tools of government to kill and control other human beings....let me say this again....to the government (repub or democrat) a soldier is a tool and thats all.

Also unborn babies arent considered people by libs because they arent "legally" the property of the state until they are born....a republican wants to save the baby so that one day they can indoctrinate it into "christianity" and send it off into a war.

2007-10-07 16:35:28 · answer #8 · answered by fortwynt 2 · 6 3

When have you ever heard a lib say that they support the death of babies, American and otherwise? More pointedly, when have you ever heard a lib say that they support abortion? What makes you think that those who are pro-choice are pro-abortion? I suppose some exist somewhere, but the majority of us who support choice do not, necessarily, support abortion.

I am a Christian Republican who considers herself a conservative and I support choice but I don't support abortion. I believe that it is my choice and responsibility to do what is best for my family, not you, not the government and not some religion. ME. If I choose to abort for reasons that are none of your business, it is because my husband and I have discussed it and decided it was the only thing we could do.

That said, I don't really think most libs do support our troops. I am beginning to think that you can support the troops but condemn the work they do.

2007-10-07 16:38:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

If abortion were illegal, do you think that would stop the women who intend of having one? Are the lives of young girls and women, which would be at risk from a wire hanger procedure, less important than your moral judgment on them?

If you are trying to be religious here, than leave it in Gods hands. The bible says that god knows when one will be born, and when they will die. There is free will, but he knows what we will do before.

Leave the sinners to God. You can voice your opinion. You can opt out of having an abortion (men will never have that problem). You can vote, and that's it.

You cannot force your beliefs on others. Separation of church and state. Live with it.

2007-10-07 16:42:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Apples and oranges!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My question back to you is how can you support a war based on lies?
Bush ignored national security and terrorism until after we were attacked on 9/11!As a direct result we invaded both Afganistan and Iraq!

2007-10-07 16:36:39 · answer #11 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 6 5

fedest.com, questions and answers