Bush recieved a daily briefing on 8/6/2001 stating "Bin Laden determined to strike inside US".
So how could the 20th hijacker(moussaoui) be in FBI custody for weeks before 9/11 and the plot not be foiled?
Why did FBI HQ deny Minneapolis field offices' requests for FISA warrants for weeks before 9/11!
All of which makes me wonder what orders did Bush give after his briefing to ensure national seurity!
2007-10-07 15:27:54 · 13 answers · asked by honestamerican 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Marxist then why are there so many people questioning the 9/11 report?
2007-10-07 15:35:17 · update #1
Joe the problem with that thinking is thinking they'll allow the war to end.......
2007-10-07 15:41:48 · update #2
robee you act as if it is irrelivent.......but it is the only reason we are currently in Iraq and Afganistan!
2007-10-07 15:43:28 · update #3
Why do the people who say we don't need another one explain the simple facts of what I have said?
2007-10-07 15:45:25 · update #4
Chris you are just ranting the neo-con line without explaining to me the FACTS!
MOUSSAOUI was in FBI custody for weeks before 9/11!
Why did FBI HQ in washington deny the requested FISA warrants from the Minneapolis office??????
2007-10-07 15:48:16 · update #5
G-man that doesn't explain why FBI HQ denied the FISA warrants from its' own field office in Minneapolis where Moussaoui was captured!
2007-10-07 16:09:47 · update #6
Kudos to you for putting this question out there. People are going to say harsh things and people are going to continue to be brainwashed. But 9/11 was NOT the sole act of non-American terrorists. Something could have been done and should have been done, and as a result we have 9/11 to look back on.
It's people like you who ask these questions that are going to start that movement in which people demand a new investigation. It's a slow process, but an inevitable one (in my opinion).
2007-10-07 16:28:46 · answer #1 · answered by lafemelle 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The thing that i cannot understand, or accept, is the fact that so many people have said there has never been any trace of an airplane that hit the Pentagon, the twin towers or the hole in the ground. And, why did the third tower, that was not even hit, collapse? If there is an explanation, I have never heard it. I'd like to see another, nonpartisan, investigation that will not be influenced at all by this administration.
2007-10-07 22:36:50 · answer #2 · answered by ArRo 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
the commissions report was a total scam!!!
have patients!!!
bush has put us in a spot like when your walkin down the street, he picks up a rock and throws it at a hornets nest and runs off to safety into his house and locks the door!!!
leaving everyone else outside to get stung!!!
so after we get out of this war mess we will focus on his crimes!!!
i read a few days ago that bush is trying to set it up so he can pardon hisself!!!
theres just too much there too laugh off as crazy stuff!!!
c.n.n. showed a few weeks ago a picture of one of our cammand planes right over the towers at the time!!!
it might end up a cold case but with murder there is no statute of limitations!!!
and if clinton killed someone, take him down too!!!
2007-10-07 22:39:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Well, well another day in Conspiracyland. The simple fact is that Clinton cut all ties of the FBI and CIA being able to be able to communicate with each other. And what was Bush supposed to do with that report. That report was not specific, nor exact. So what, what could he do? You tell me.
Okay, how about citing some facts about them actually holding him. I don't think the bipartisan 9/11 committee, which was a lynchmob would have missed that, no matter how much Bush hid it.
2007-10-07 22:57:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 7⤋
Dude are you serious??? What is it that you are looking for?? How many "briefings" do you think this man got? Which one is telling the truth? All you want to hear is G.W. f_cked up....let it go. It was Bin Laden and his cohorts that flew those planes into our building!! No matter how you slice it.. G.W. didn't do it. Do you think Gore would of thwarted off the attacks??? HA!! Remember it was Clinton lax attitude towards terrorist attack on our military and soil that set the president for the next administration...Gore or Bush.
2007-10-07 22:44:06 · answer #5 · answered by V3g 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋
We won't. Or most of us. I am only glad that a Republican was in office. Rush would have had 25 years of something to rant about. He would have gone to his grave screaming conspiracy.
2007-10-07 22:43:21 · answer #6 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think we have learned all there is to know. I am sorry for what happened. It happened 6 years ago. Move on. Ask why we are still in Iraq instead.
2007-10-07 22:36:30 · answer #7 · answered by robee 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hopefully never because it would be a waste of time and money. We know what happen, know who did it and just need to really do something about it.
Instead of focusing on false conspiracy theories we need to make a real difference by uping our security and killing real radicals like Hugo Chavz et al.
2007-10-08 00:59:31 · answer #8 · answered by A Human Bean 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Sorry, it's got to go to the end of the cue.
Roswell, the UN Black Helicopters, the Hollow Earth and ManBearPig are ahead in line.
It will have to wait it's turn.
2007-10-07 22:40:49 · answer #9 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 0⤊ 6⤋
No more investigations. It's done and over with. It's been 6 years so we can't learn anything more.
2007-10-07 23:01:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋