i think this mught be true....they have played the giants, miami,LOL...chicago, and the rams...and buffalo tomorrow hahahahaahaha....that is a very pitiful list of teams with 2 teams not even having a win yet...i mean come on now..of course their 4-0...
2007-10-07 14:24:55 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Cowboys overrated,
Pats will bring them back to earth next week.
Do you see the injuries on the opposing teams the Pats defense puts on them???
Cowboys and Romo next.
Watch out for Rodney Harrison baby........................
The Cowboys may even lose to Buffalo as they look ahead to next weeks game. Watch out for an upset...
2007-10-07 14:59:26 · answer #1 · answered by Cody 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Pats have not played a good team neither. All of them have losing records.
Probably San Diego is not that bad, but in that case the Giants are playing better than SD this season, with losses against the 2 undefeated teams.
2007-10-07 14:59:07 · answer #2 · answered by M. Diego 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on which attendance record you're referring to. The Cowboys drew 105,000 a few years ago. The NBA All-Star game a couple years ago drew a few more thousand than that. A boxing match drew 51,000 shortly after that NBA All-Star game. Wrestlemania can easily out-draw that boxing attendance record, Stone Cold or not. Wrestlemania 28 drew a "capacity crowd" of 78,000+ with The Rock...and the possibility of The Undertaker's retirement match. Wrestlemania has been drawing 72,000 to 80,000 the past several years. A lot of that has to do with The Undertaker defending The Streak. And who he's been defending it against. Batista, Edge, HBK, Triple H, major drawing superstars. Given that the WWE's been playing gigantic arenas for Wrestlemania the past several years and selling them out, it would seem that Wrestlemania could easily top 100,000 at Cowboys Stadium, with Stone Cold headlining. BUT What about The Undertaker? I would argue that HE'S been Wrestlemania's top draw and top selling point the past several years. If he defends The Streak at WM30 (especially against Cena) that's headlined by Stone Cold vs Punk, yeah, new all-time attendance record for any event at that arena. But if Taker's not there? Who can possibly substitute and draw like Taker can? I don't think Austin could do it alone; he wouldn't have the "surprise" factor that The Rock had; Austin shows up from time to time; The Rock wasn't supposed to ever return. The WWE's gonna need somebody BIG to step in for Taker. Rock vs Cena 2 could do it. Cena or Rock vs Sting could do it. Maybe Kurt Angle returning to take on Cena or whoever the Champ is, could do it. We can't discount or overlook The Undertaker. With him and Austin WM30 could break the all-time attendance record. Without him, the WWE's in danger of not selling out the show. They'll need somebody the stature and drawing power of Rock, Sting, or Angle if they hope for 80,000+, especially if they hope to top 100,000.
2016-05-18 03:46:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe, but they're undefeated and along with the Packers, look like the best team in the NFC thus far. It might not end up that way at the end of the season, but so far, they've done all they could do, and more than alot of people expected. But you could certainly be right, the big test comes at home against New England next week.
2007-10-07 14:50:56 · answer #4 · answered by Team Captain 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree...The Patriots have played the tougher opponents...The Chargers most significantly...Sure people are gonna say the Chargers are off this year...but this week, it looks like they turned it around...
No way that the Cowboys will keep up with New England in the end...and Wade Phillips may be a good coordinator, but as a head coach, he is overrated...he will be over his head against Belichick and the Patriots...
2007-10-07 14:31:42 · answer #5 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And yet the SAME case can be made for the Pats, who have faced no good teams as of yet... Plus the Pats play in a division that has 3 HORRIBLE teams in it, so automatically win 6 games a year...
2007-10-07 14:31:51 · answer #6 · answered by HONORARIUS 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What do you mean of coursed they're 4-0? It's not like those four games were close what-so-ever. Just wait until they beat the Pats and then you'll see.
2007-10-07 15:53:55 · answer #7 · answered by FutbolFan2147 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
all of the teams who are without a loss played sorry teams. and the Wolverines suck. Henne should kill himself, Mallett will/should start the rest of the year. Get ready for next season, that seems to be their motto.
2007-10-07 14:30:31 · answer #8 · answered by Snakebite 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Question? was any of those teams one of yours,last time I saw,they were on top of their division,and they've done it with out video cameras
2007-10-07 15:40:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
last time i checked, 4-0 is perfect
2007-10-07 14:28:18 · answer #10 · answered by St. John Bosco 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋